Question
Question: Which one of the following statements is true? A. If \(\underset{x\to c}{\mathop{\lim }}\,f\left( ...
Which one of the following statements is true?
A. If x→climf(x).g(x)and x→climf(x)exist, then x→climg(x)exists.
B. If x→climf(x).g(x)exists, then x→climf(x)and x→climg(x)exist.
C. If x→clim(f(x)+g(x))and x→climf(x) exist, then x→climg(x)exist.
D. Ifx→clim(f(x)+g(x))exists, then x→climf(x)and x→climg(x)exist.
Solution
Hint: Use counter examples to verify the given statements. Try to make examples related with the functions modulus, greatest integer, logarithm etc. to get accurate results.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Here, we have to find a true statement from the given options. So, we will discuss from option A to D with examples. As we need to use counter examples for the given statements.
Option A. is given as
If x→climf(x).g(x)and x→climf(x)exist, then x→climg(x)exists.
Here one counter example of the given statement is given as
f(x)=xg(x)=[x]
So, f(x).g(x)=x[x].
And let c=0, and check for the existence of given functions.
As, f(x)=x is existing at x→0 and will givex→0limx=0.
So, x→0limf(x) exists.
We havef(x).g(x)=x[x].
Apply limit x→0tox[x].
For LHL,
x→0−limx[x]
Here [x] will give value ‘-1’as x is lying between (-1,0).
So, expression will become
x→0−limx(−1)=0( As x→0−).
For RHL,
x→0+limx[x]
Here, [x] will give value ‘0’ as x is lying between (0,1).
Hence , we get x→0+limx(0)=0(0)=0
So, LHL=RHL for f(x)g(x)at x→0.
Hence, x→0limf(x).g(x)exists.
Now, we have g(x)=[x].
For LHL, we get x→0−lim[x]
So, LHL=-1
For RHL, we get
x→0+lim[x].
So, RHL=0.
Hence, x→0limg(x) does not exist.
So, option A. is incorrect as here x→climf(x).g(x)exists and x→climf(x)exist but x→climg(x) doesn’t exist.
Option B. is given as
If x→climf(x).g(x)exists, then x→climf(x)and x→climg(x)exist.
We can take some counter example as explained above where
f(x)=x,g(x)=[x]f(x)g(x)=x[x]
So, option B. is incorrect as well.
Here, option D is given as Ifx→clim(f(x)+g(x))exists, then x→climf(x)and x→climg(x)exist.
We can take counter example for this option as
f\left( x \right)=\left\\{ \begin{aligned}
& +1,x\ge 0 \\\
& -1,x<0 \\\
\end{aligned} \right.
g\left( x \right)=\left\\{ \begin{aligned}
& -1,x\ge 0 \\\
& +1,x<0 \\\
\end{aligned} \right.
where f(x)and g(x)will not exist at x→0as LHL and RHL will have different values at x→0−and x→0+ respectively.
Now, f(x)+g(x)is given as
f\left( x \right)+g\left( x \right)=\left\\{ \begin{aligned}
& 0,x\ge 0 \\\
& 0,x<0 \\\
\end{aligned} \right.
or
f(x)+g(x)= 0
Which exists at x→0as x→0−and x→0+will give the same value 0.
Hence, option D. is also incorrect asx→clim(f(x)+g(x))exists, but x→climf(x)and x→climg(x)is not existing in the above example.
Therefore option C. is the correct answer from the given statements.
Note: One cannot relatef(x), g(x)and f(x)+g(x)orf(x).g(x)for any limit x→cdirectly.
So, taking counterexamples to these kinds of questions is the only way to find the correct answer.
One can get some examples for corrections of option A, B, C, D but statements used here are general statements. So, try to use modulus, fractional, greatest integer functions etc. to verify these kinds of statements.