Question
Question: Two parallel wires in the place of the paper are distance \( {X_0} \) apart. A point charge is movin...
Two parallel wires in the place of the paper are distance X0 apart. A point charge is moving with speed u between the wires in the same plane at a distance X1 from one of the wires. When the wires carry current of magnitude I in the same direction, the radius of curvature of the path of the point charge is R1 . In contrast, if the current has opposite directions to each other, the radius of the curvature of the path is R2 . If X1X0=3 , the value of R2R1 is
(A) 3
(B) 7
(C) 2
(D) 5
Solution
Hint : For current in the same direction, find the difference between the magnetic fields at the charge while for currents in opposite directions, add the magnetic fields. And the radius of curvature is inversely proportional to the magnetic field.
Formula used: B=2πxμ0I where B is the magnetic field, μ0 is the permeability of free space and x is the distance from the wire.
Complete step by step answer
The field experienced by the charge due to the wire on its left (say wire 1) is given as
⇒B1=2πx1μ0I
And the field experienced by the charge due to the wire on its right (say wire 2) is given as
⇒B2=2π(x0−x1)μ0I
The total field experienced by the charge when the current are in the same direction is given by subtracting the magnetic fields as in
⇒B1,2−=2πx1μ0I−2π(x0−x1)μ0I
This is because the field points in the different direction at location of charge.
Factoring 2πμ0I out, we get
⇒B1,2−=2πμ0I(x11−x0−x11) ⇒B1,2−=2πμ0I[x1(x0−x1)(x0−x1)−x1]
Thus, by subtraction in the numerator we get,
⇒B1,2−=2πμ0I(x1(x0−x1)x0−2x1)
For the current in the opposite direction, we add magnetic fields.
⇒B1,2+=2πx1μ0I+2π(x0−x1)μ0I
Similarly, by factorization and addition, we get
⇒B1,2−=2πμ0I[x1(x0−x1)x0]
The radius of curvature of a charge in a magnetic field is inversely related to the magnetic field B i.e.
⇒R∝B1 ⇒R=Bk
Where k is a constant. Thus,
⇒RB=k ⇒R1B1,2−=R2B1,2+
Then, dividing both sides by R2 and B1,2− ,
R2R1=B1,2−B1,2+
Therefore, inserting the expressions for B1,2+ and B1,2− in equation above, we have
\Rightarrow
\dfrac{{{R_1}}}{{{R_2}}} = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2\pi }}\left[ {\dfrac{{{x_0}}}{{{x_1}({x_0} - {x_1})}}} \right] \div \left\\{ {\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2\pi }}\left[ {\dfrac{{{x_0} - 2{x_1}}}{{{x_1}({x_0} - {x_1})}}} \right]} \right\\}\, \\\
\Rightarrow \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2\pi }}\left[ {\dfrac{{{x_0}}}{{{x_1}({x_0} - {x_1})}}} \right] \times \dfrac{{2\pi }}{{{\mu _0}I}}\left[ {\dfrac{{{x_1}({x_0} - {x_1})}}{{{x_0} - 2{x_1}}}} \right] \\\
Eliminating μ0I , 2π and x1(x0−x1) we get
⇒R2R1=x0−2x1x0
Dividing numerator and denominator by x1 we get,
⇒R2R1=x1x0−2x1x0=3−23=3 (since x1x0=3 )
Hence, the correct option is A.
Note
In the calculation of the total magnetic field, we subtracted when the current are facing the same direction because using the right hand rule (which states that if your thumb points in the direction of the current, then your fingers curl around the direction of the magnetic field), the magnetic field due to wire 1 points into the page but the magnetic field due to wire two points out of the page. However, when they are in opposite directions the magnetic fields of wire 1 and 2 both point out of the page.