Question
Question: This question has statement 1 and statement 2. Of the four choices given after the statements, choos...
This question has statement 1 and statement 2. Of the four choices given after the statements, choose the one that best describes the two statements. An insulating solid sphere of radius R has a uniformly positive charge density ρ. As a result of this uniform charge distribution there is a finite value of electric potential at the centre of the sphere, at the surface of the sphere and also at a point outside the sphere. The electric potential at infinity is zero.
Statement-1: When a charge q is taken from the centre to the surface of the sphere, its potential energy changes by 3ε0qρ
Statement-2: The electric field at a distance r (rA. Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is true; statement-2 is not the correct explanation of statement-1.
B. statement-1 is true, statement-2 is false.
C. statement-1 is false, statement-2 is true.
D. statement-1 is true, statement-2 is true; statement-2 is not the correct explanation of statement-1.
Solution
You could begin by proving the statement-2. You will get an expression for the electric field at a distance r from the centre by using Gauss’s law and then compare it with that given in statement-2. Now you could substitute that expression in the expression of potential difference in terms of electric field and further substitute that potential difference in the expression of change in potential energy and check whether you get it same as that given in statement-1.
Formula used:
Gauss’s law,
s∫E∙dA=ε01Qen
Expression for change in potential energy,
ΔU=qΔV
Expression for change in potential,
ΔV=∫E∙dr
Complete answer:
For statement-2
Let us consider a Gaussian surface at distance r (rs∫E∙dA=ε01Qen
Since the given sphere is positively charged, we know that the electric field line will be radially outward as shown in the figure and the areal vector is also normal to the surface. Hence the angle between them is 0. So, s∫EdAcos0=ε01Qen
Es∫dA=ε01Qen …………………….. (1)
But we know that Surface charge density (ρ) is given by,
ρ=VQ
Q=ρV ………………………. (2)
Where, Q is the charge enclosed by the surface and V is the volume of the surface under consideration. The surface under consideration in the given question is that of a sphere, the volume here is the volume of a sphere given by,
V=34πr3
Now (2) becomes
Q=ρ×34πr3 …………………. (3)
Also integratingdA we get the surface area of the sphere which is given by,
∫dA=4πr2 …………………… (4)
Substituting (3) and (4) in (1), we get,
E×(4πr2)=ε01(ρ×34πr3)
⇒E=3ε0ρr
Therefore, the electric field at a distance r (rSo, the statement-2 is true.
For statement-1
We know that the change in potential energy is given by,
ΔU=qΔV ………………………….. (5)
Here the charge is taken from centre to the surface, so, the potential difference is given by,
ΔV=VS−VC
We have the expression for potential difference as,
ΔV=∫E∙dr …………………….. (6)
As the sphere is positively charged the electric field is directed radially outward and the radial vector dR is also in the same direction. So the angle between them is 0. So (6) can be given as,
ΔV=r=0∫r=REdRcos0=r=0∫r=REdR
But, the electric field at a distance r (rSubstituting, we get,
⇒ΔV=0∫R(3ε0ρr)dR
⇒ΔV=3ε0ρ(2r2)0R
⇒ΔV=6ε0ρR2
Now from (5), the change in potential energy can be given by,
⇒ΔU=q(6ε0ρR2)
Therefore, when a charge q is taken from the centre to the surface of the sphere, its potential energy changes by 6ε0ρqR2
So the statement-1 is false.
Therefore, statement-1 is false, statement-2 is true.
Hence the answer to the question is option C.
Note:
Though in the above solution we have begun proving the statement-2 true and then using the electric field derived there in proving statement-1, you could actually begin from statement-1. You could separately find the potential at centre and then at the surface and hence the potential difference between those points and then substitute to get the change in potential energy. So, you shouldn’t necessarily depend on the proof of statement-2 to prove statement-1.