Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: The resistance of the meter bridge AB is given in figure is \(4\Omega \) with cell of emf E=0.5V and...

The resistance of the meter bridge AB is given in figure is 4Ω4\Omega with cell of emf E=0.5V and rheostat resistance Rh=2ΩRh=2\Omega the null point is obtained at some point J. When the cell is replaced by another one of emf E=E2E={{E}_{2}} the same null point J is found for Rh=6ΩRh=6\Omega . The emf E is:
a) 0.6V
b) 0.5V
c) 0.3V
d)0.4V

Explanation

Solution

The resistance of the meter bridge is given as 4Ω4\Omega hence we can obtain the resistance per unit length i.e. 1m of the meter bridge. First we need to determine the potential gradient when the rheostat in the circuit is varied. Hence comparing the two cases, the emf E of the cell can be determined
Formula used:
ϕ=Vll\phi =\dfrac{{{V}_{l}}}{l}

Complete answer:

In the first case an emf of 0.5V is connected to the meter bridge such that the null point is obtained at J. In the above circuit diagram we can see a battery of 6V is connected to the meter bridge wire via rheostat. If V is the emf of the cell i.e. 6V, VRh{{V}_{Rh}} is the drop across the rheostat and Vl{{V}_{l}} is the potential drop across the wire AB of length ‘l’, then using Kirchhoff’s law we get,
V=VRh+VlV={{V}_{Rh}}+{{V}_{l}}
Since from ohm’s law, voltage across a resistor is equal to the product of current times the resistance, the current (i) in the above condition we get,
V=VRh+Vl 6V=i2Ω+i4Ω i=6V6Ω i=1A \begin{aligned} & V={{V}_{Rh}}+{{V}_{l}} \\\ & \Rightarrow 6V=i2\Omega +i4\Omega \\\ & \Rightarrow i=\dfrac{6V}{6\Omega } \\\ & \therefore i=1A \\\ \end{aligned}
Since current is equal to 1 ampere, the potential drop across the wire AB is,
Vl=iRl Vl=1A×4Ω Vl=4V \begin{aligned} & {{V}_{l}}=i{{R}_{l}} \\\ & \Rightarrow {{V}_{l}}=1A\times 4\Omega \\\ & \therefore {{V}_{l}}=4V \\\ \end{aligned}
This 4V is dropped across a length of 1 m i.e. 100cm.Therefore potential gradient ϕ\phi (potential drop per unit length of the wire) is,
ϕ=Vll ϕ=4V100cm=0.04Vcm1 \begin{aligned} & \phi =\dfrac{{{V}_{l}}}{l} \\\ & \therefore \phi =\dfrac{4V}{100cm}=0.04Vc{{m}^{-1}} \\\ \end{aligned}
When an emf of 0.5V is connected, the length LJ{{L}_{J}} of the balancing point with respect to A is equal to,
LJ=E1ϕ LJ=0.5V0.04Vcm1 LJ=12.5cm \begin{aligned} & {{L}_{J}}=\dfrac{{{E}_{1}}}{\phi } \\\ & \Rightarrow {{L}_{J}}=\dfrac{0.5V}{0.04Vc{{m}^{-1}}} \\\ & \therefore {{L}_{J}}=12.5cm \\\ \end{aligned}
When another cell of emf E2{{E}_{2}} is connected the balancing length is the same, but potential gradient varies as the resistance of the rheostat is changed to Rh=6ΩRh=6\Omega . hence the current across the wire AB is,
V=VRh+Vl 6V=i6Ω+i4Ω i=6V10Ω i=0.6A \begin{aligned} & V={{V}_{Rh}}+{{V}_{l}} \\\ & \Rightarrow 6V=i6\Omega +i4\Omega \\\ & \Rightarrow i=\dfrac{6V}{10\Omega } \\\ & \therefore i=0.6A \\\ \end{aligned}
Hence the drop across the wire AB is,
Vl=iRl Vl=0.6A×4Ω Vl=2.4V \begin{aligned} & {{V}_{l}}=i{{R}_{l}} \\\ & \Rightarrow {{V}_{l}}=0.6A\times 4\Omega \\\ & \therefore {{V}_{l}}=2.4V \\\ \end{aligned}
Therefore the potential gradient across the wire would be,
ϕ=Vll ϕ=2.4V100cm=0.024Vcm1 \begin{aligned} & \phi =\dfrac{{{V}_{l}}}{l} \\\ & \therefore \phi =\dfrac{2.4V}{100cm}=0.024Vc{{m}^{-1}} \\\ \end{aligned}
In the question it is given that the balancing length is the same. Hence the potential drop across the balancing length i.e. E2{{E}_{2}} is,
E2=LJϕ E2=12.5cm×0.024Vcm1 E2=0.3V \begin{aligned} & {{E}_{2}}={{L}_{J}}\phi \\\ & \Rightarrow {{E}_{2}}=12.5cm\times 0.024Vc{{m}^{-1}} \\\ & \therefore {{E}_{2}}=0.3V \\\ \end{aligned}

Hence the correct answer of the above question is option c.

Note:
It is to be noted that the wire in the meter bridge should have uniform resistance. If not then the principle of potential gradient will not be valid. The above is basically a set up of a potentiometer but it can be called as a meter bridge as the length of the wire is 1m.