Solveeit Logo
Login

Question

Question: The present atomic weight scale is based on: A) \({C^{12}}\) B) \({O^{16}}\) C) \({H^1}\) D...

The present atomic weight scale is based on:
A) C12{C^{12}}
B) O16{O^{16}}
C) H1{H^1}
D) C13{C^{13}}

Explanation

Solution

We know that C12{C^{12}} and C13{C^{13}} are the two isotopes. Each of them has an equal number of protons and electrons, thus the same atomic number. The atomic number of isotopes is six. But carbon-1212 has six neutrons while carbon-1313 has 77 neutrons. Hence, to characterize present day nuclear weight scale should indicate carbon iota addresses the scale.

Complete answer:
Usually, the atomic weight of an atom is equal to the number of protons or electrons in an atom. Hence, lots of elements have isotopes and they use average atomic mass. On the periodic table, the weight of carbon is noted as 12.01 amu12.01\,amu which is the average mass of the carbon atom.
Current nuclear weight scale depends on C12{C^{12}}. The standard unit for communicating the mass of iota is amu (nuclear mass unit). It is equivalent to 112\frac{1}{{12}} of the mass of a particle of carbon-1212 . Hence option A is correct.

Additional information:
Researchers settled on utilizing the carbon-1212 nuclide as the reference standard by which any remaining masses would be analyzed. By definition, one molecule of carbon-1212 is appointed a mass of 1212 nuclear mass units (amu). A nuclear mass unit is characterized as a mass equivalent to one twelfth the mass of a particle of carbon-1212 . The mass of any isotope of any component is communicated according to the carbon-1212 norm. For instance, one iota of helium-44 has a mass of 4.00264.0026 amu. An iota of sulfur-3232 has a mass of 31.97231.972 amu.

Note:
We have to know that the masses of individual iotas are extremely small. Utilizing a cutting edge gadget called a mass spectrometer; it is feasible to gauge such microscopic masses. A particle of oxygen-16, for instance, has a mass of 2.66×10−23g2.66 \times {10^{ - 23}}g. While correlations of masses estimated in grams would have some value, it is undeniably more pragmatic to have a framework that will permit us to all more effectively think about relative nuclear masses.