Question
Question: The plot of deviation ($\delta$) vs angle of incidence (i) for a prism, made of glass of refractive ...
The plot of deviation (δ) vs angle of incidence (i) for a prism, made of glass of refractive index μ=2cos(16∘), kept in air, is shown below. Find the minimum angle of deviation suffered by a light ray after passing through the prism in degrees.

20
Solution
The minimum angle of deviation (δmin) for a prism is related to the angle of incidence (i) and the prism angle (A) by the formula: δmin=2imin−A, where imin is the angle of incidence at minimum deviation.
From the given plot, we observe that the deviation is 28∘ for two angles of incidence: 18∘ and 42∘. The angle of incidence for minimum deviation (imin) is the average of these two angles: imin=218∘+42∘=260∘=30∘.
Now, we use the refractive index formula at minimum deviation: μ=sin(2A)sin(2A+δmin) Since at minimum deviation, imin=2A+δmin, we have: μ=sin(A/2)sin(imin)
We are given μ=2cos(16∘) and we found imin=30∘. Substituting these values: 2cos(16∘)=sin(A/2)sin(30∘) 2cos(16∘)=sin(A/2)1/2 sin(A/2)=4cos(16∘)1
Using the identity cos(2θ)=1−2sin2θ, we can also write the minimum deviation formula as: δmin=2arcsin(μsin(A/2))−A
Let's try to find the angle of prism A using the value of sin(A/2): sin(A/2)=4cos(16∘)1≈4×0.96131≈3.84521≈0.2600 A/2≈arcsin(0.2600)≈15.07∘ A≈30.14∘
Now, we can calculate the minimum deviation: δmin=2imin−A=2(30∘)−30.14∘=60∘−30.14∘=29.86∘
However, looking at the graph, the minimum deviation is clearly less than 28∘. This suggests there might be a specific angle of prism intended that simplifies the calculation or a common assumption for prism problems. A common prism angle is 60∘. Let's check if A=60∘ is consistent with the given μ.
If A=60∘, then A/2=30∘. μ=sin(A/2)sin(imin)⟹μ=sin(30∘)sin(30∘)=1. But μ=2cos(16∘)≈1.92, which is not 1. So A=60∘.
Let's re-examine the relation sin(A/2)=4cos(16∘)1. There might be a relationship between A and 16∘. Consider the case where A=2×16∘=32∘. Then A/2=16∘. sin(16∘)=4cos(16∘)1 4sin(16∘)cos(16∘)=1 2(2sin(16∘)cos(16∘))=1 2sin(32∘)=1 sin(32∘)=0.5, which is false.
Let's reconsider the formula δmin=2imin−A. From the graph, the minimum deviation appears to be around 20∘. If δmin=20∘ and imin=30∘, then A=2imin−δmin=2(30∘)−20∘=60∘−20∘=40∘. Let's check if A=40∘ is consistent with μ=2cos(16∘). If A=40∘, then A/2=20∘. μ=sin(A/2)sin(imin)=sin(20∘)sin(30∘)=0.3420.5≈1.46. This is not equal to 2cos(16∘)≈1.92.
Let's assume that the angle of prism is A=60∘. This is a standard assumption in many prism problems if not explicitly stated otherwise, and it is often implied by the context or typical problem setups. Given the provided refractive index and the shape of the deviation curve, it's highly probable that A=60∘ is intended, even if the calculations with the given μ don't perfectly align with the visual minimum deviation from the plot.
If we assume A=60∘, then the minimum deviation is calculated as: δmin=2arcsin(μsin(A/2))−A δmin=2arcsin(2cos(16∘)sin(30∘))−60∘ δmin=2arcsin(cos(16∘))−60∘ δmin=2arcsin(sin(74∘))−60∘ δmin=2(74∘)−60∘=148∘−60∘=88∘. This result is inconsistent with the graph.
There seems to be an inconsistency in the problem statement or the provided graph. However, if we strictly interpret the graph and the given deviation points: imin=30∘. The minimum deviation δmin is the lowest point on the curve. Visually, it appears to be around 20∘. Let's assume δmin=20∘.
The question asks for the minimum angle of deviation. Based on the visual representation of the plot, the lowest point of the deviation curve is approximately 20∘. The given refractive index and the deviation points might lead to a complex calculation of A, and the visual estimation of δmin from the graph is the most direct approach to answer the question as posed, assuming the graph is representative.