Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: The objective lens of a compound microscope produces magnification of \(10\) . In order to get an ov...

The objective lens of a compound microscope produces magnification of 1010 . In order to get an overall magnification of 100100 when image is formed at 25cm25\,cm from the eye, the focal length of the eye lens should be :(in cm)
A) 44
B) 1010
C) 259\dfrac{{25}}{9}
D) 99

Explanation

Solution

To solve this question, you need to realize that the net magnification of a compound microscope is nothing but the product of magnification due to objective lens and magnification due to eye lens. Thus, you can write:
M=Mo×MeM = {M_o} \times {M_e}

Complete step by step answer:
As described in the hint section of the solution to this question, we need to use the fact and formula:
M=Mo×MeM = {M_o} \times {M_e}
We can see that the value of magnification of the compound microscope should be 100100
The value of magnification due to objective lens is 1010
What’s not given is the value of magnification due to the eye lens. So, we need to find it.
Luckily, it is a very generalized result that the magnification due to eye lens in a compound microscope can be given as:
Me=1+Dfe{M_e} = 1 + \dfrac{D}{{{f_e}}}
Where, DD is the distance of nearest vision, which is numerically given to be 25cm25\,cm in the question.
fe{f_e} is the focal length of the eye lens, which is not given in the question and we have to find its value.
Now, we can confidently substitute this value in the formula
M=Mo×MeM = {M_o} \times {M_e}
Substituting Me=1+Dfe{M_e} = 1 + \dfrac{D}{{{f_e}}} , we get:
M=Mo(1+Dfe)M = {M_o}\left( {1 + \dfrac{D}{{{f_e}}}} \right)
After transposing, we get the formula for fe{f_e} as:
fe=MoDMMo{f_e} = \dfrac{{{M_o}D}}{{M - {M_o}}}
Substituting in the values, we get:
fe=10×2510010 fe=259cm  {f_e} = \dfrac{{10 \times 25}}{{100 - 10}} \\\ {f_e} = \dfrac{{25}}{9}\,cm \\\
Hence, we can see that the option (C) is correct as it matches the value that we found out upon solving the question.

Note: Many students add the magnifications of the respective lenses instead of multiplying them to find the net magnification of the lens and thus, reach at a wrong answer. Another mistake is that they do not use the correct formula for the magnification due to the eye lens as there are many confusing similar formulae for different microscopes and telescopes present in the same topic.