Question
Question: The electron configuration for chromium is \(\left[ Ar \right]4{{s}^{1}}\text{ }3{{d}^{5}}\). Select...
The electron configuration for chromium is [Ar]4s1 3d5. Select the best explanation for this irregular electron configuration.
A. A half-filled d orbital is slightly lower in energy than the 4s, thus filling first.
B. The 4s orbital is at a lower energy than the 3d orbital, thus filling first.
C. Chromium is a transition metal and its electrons are loosely held.
D. d orbitals are dominant and shield electrons from orbitals close in energy.
Solution
According to Hund’s principle which states that, when electron starts filling up subshells, they do it such that the electrons of the same spin must solely occupy the orbitals within the subshell first and then the electrons of opposite spin will start filling up the remaining space in the orbitals.
Complete answer:
We know that the order of stability is defined as:
Fully-filled orbital > half-filled orbital > partially-filled orbital
We also know that s-orbital can accommodate a maximum of 2 electrons, p-orbital can accommodate a maximum of 6 electrons, d-orbital can accommodate a maximum of 10 electrons and f-orbital can accommodate a maximum of 14 electrons.
So, in 4s1 3d5we see that both the s and p orbitals are half-filled. In case of chromium, the expected electronic configuration is 4s2 3d4, yet actually we see that one electron from 4s gets transferred to 3d orbital making it 4s1 3d5. This happens because 4s1 3d5 being a more stable configuration.
Electron orbitals are most stable when fully-filled or half-filled, hence the most stable configuration of electrons for 3d subshells is either 3d10or 3d5. In the case of chromium, after 4s2 3d4 configuration is attained, and electron from s-orbital gets transferred to 3d subshell because 3d5 is much more stable configuration than 3d4. This is why the configuration for chromium is 4s1 3d5.
So, the correct answer is “Option A”.
Note: In the case of chromium, it is an exception of the Aufbau principle and the systematic rule of the principle does not comply with its electron configuration. The classical rule that there are orbitals with different energy levels state that
1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 4s < 3d < 4p and so on. Same results are seen in Cu where the expected configuration is [Ar]4s23d9 but the observed configuration is [Ar]4s13d10