Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: The electrode potentials for \(C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \rig...

The electrode potentials for Cu2+(aq)+eCu+(aq)C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right)and Cu+(aq)+eCu(s)C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to Cu\left( s \right) are +0.15V + 0.15\,Vand +0.50V + 0.50\,Vrespectively. The value of ECu2+/Cu{E^ \circ }_{C{u^{2 + }}/Cu} will be:
(i) 0.500V0.500\,V
(ii) 0.325V0.325\,V
(iii) 0.650V0.650\,V
(iv) 0.150V0.150\,V

Explanation

Solution

Standard electrode potential (E)\left( {{E^ \circ }} \right) is defined as the measure of the individual potential of a reversible electrode at standard state with ions at an effective concentration of 1moldm31\,mol\,d{m^{ - 3}} and at the pressure of 1atm1\,atm. The standard Gibbs Free energy change for a reaction can be given by the formula ΔG=nFE\Delta {G^ \circ } = - nF{E^ \circ }. Add the given reactions in suitable order to get the final reaction and hence calculate E{E^ \circ }.

Complete step-by-step answer: Standard electrode potential (E)\left( {{E^ \circ }} \right) is defined as the measure of the individual potential of a reversible electrode at standard state with ions at an effective concentration of 1moldm31\,mol\,d{m^{ - 3}} and at the pressure of 1atm1\,atm. It can be of two types standard oxidation potential and standard reduction potential. Generally electrode potentials are represented in terms of their reduction potentials. Hence ECu2+/Cu{E^ \circ }_{C{u^{2 + }}/Cu} corresponds to the reaction, Cu2+(aq)+2eCu(s)C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + 2{e^ - } \to Cu\left( s \right).
We must add the given reactions: Cu2+(aq)+eCu+(aq)C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right)and Cu+(aq)+eCu(s)C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to Cu\left( s \right)suitably to get the final equation.
Now, the standard Gibbs Free energy change for a reaction can be given by the formula ΔG=nFE\Delta {G^ \circ } = - nF{E^ \circ }where nnis the number of change in electrons, FFis Faraday and E{E^ \circ } is the standard electrode potential.
So, for the reaction Cu2+(aq)+eCu+(aq).......(1),ΔG1=n1FE1C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right).......\left( 1 \right),\,\Delta {G^ \circ }_1 = - {n_1}F{E^ \circ }_1. Since the change in number of electrons is 11 and the E{E^ \circ } value corresponding to the reaction is +0.15V + 0.15\,V. Therefore, ΔG1=1×F×0.15V\Delta {G^ \circ }_1 = - 1 \times F \times 0.15\,V.
For the reaction Cu+(aq)+eCu(s).......(2),ΔG2=n2FE2C{u^ + }\left( {aq} \right) + {e^ - } \to Cu\left( s \right).......\left( 2 \right),\,\Delta {G^ \circ }_2 = - {n_2}F{E^ \circ }_2. Since the change in number of electrons is 11 and the E{E^ \circ } value corresponding to the reaction is +0.50V + 0.50\,V. Therefore, ΔG2=1×F×0.50V\Delta {G^ \circ }_2 = - 1 \times F \times 0.50\,V.
Now, adding equations (1)\left( 1 \right)and (2)\left( 2 \right) we get, Cu2+(aq)+2eCu(s).........(3),ΔG3=n3FE3C{u^{2 + }}\left( {aq} \right) + 2{e^ - } \to Cu\left( s \right).........\left( 3 \right),\,\Delta {G^ \circ }_3 = - {n_3}F{E^ \circ }_3. Since the change in number of electrons is 22. Therefore, ΔG3=2×F×E3\Delta {G^ \circ }_3 = - 2 \times F \times {E^ \circ }_3\,.
Since Gibbs Free Energy is an additive property and we obtain equation (3)\left( 3 \right)by adding equations (1)\left( 1 \right)and (2)\left( 2 \right). Therefore, ΔG3=ΔG1+ΔG2\Delta {G^ \circ }_3 = \Delta {G^ \circ }_1 + \Delta {G^ \circ }_2.
Substituting the values we get,
- 2 \times F \times {E^ \circ }_3 = \left\\{ {\left( { - 1 \times F \times 0.15} \right) + \left( { - 1 \times F \times 0.5} \right)} \right\\}\,V
2×E3=(0.15+0.5)V=0.65V\Rightarrow 2 \times {E^ \circ }_3 = \left( {0.15 + 0.5} \right)\,V\, = \,0.65\,V
E3=0.652V=0.325V\Rightarrow {E^ \circ }_3 = \,\dfrac{{0.65}}{2}\,V\, = \,0.325\,V.
HenceECu2+/Cu=0.325V{E^ \circ }_{C{u^{2 + }}/Cu} = \,0.325\,V.

So the correct answer is (ii) 0.325V0.325\,V.

Note: Always remember electrode potentials are generally represented in terms of the reduction process. You can do the question considering the oxidation potential but then the magnitude of the electrode potential will remain the same but the sign will be reversed.