Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: The compound proposition which is always false is \[\] A.\(\left( p\to q \right)\leftrightarrow \l...

The compound proposition which is always false is $$$$
A.\left( p\to q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( \tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p \right)$$$$$ B.\left[ \left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right) \right]\leftrightarrow \left( p\to r \right) C. $\left( \tilde{\ }p\vee q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( p\to \tilde{\ }q \right)
D. p ~pp\to \tilde{\ }p$$$$

Explanation

Solution

We use the definitions of negation  ~p\tilde{\ }p, conjunction pqp\wedge q, disjunction pqp\vee q, implication pqp\to q and bi-implication pqp\leftrightarrow q to find the truth values of compositions within the brackets if there is in each option and then the whole composite statement.

Complete step-by-step solution:
We know from the mathematical logic that if the statement pp has a truth value T or F then the negation of pp is denoted as  ~p\tilde{\ }p and has truth value F or T respectively. The through the table of  ~p\tilde{\ }p is given as

pp ~p\tilde{\ }p
TF
FT

We also know that when there are two statements pp and qq, the statement with the conjunction (with logical connective AND) of their truth values is denoted as pqp\wedge q and has a truth value T only when both pp and qq have truth values, T, otherwise false. The truth table of pqp\wedge q is

ppqqpqp\wedge q
TTT
TFF
FTF
FFF

The statement with disjunction (with logical connective OR) of their truth values are denoted as p ^qp\hat{\ }q and has a truth value T only when one of pp and qq have truth value T, otherwise false. The truth table of pqp\vee q is

ppqqpqp\vee q
TTT
TFT
FTT
FFF

The statement with the implication (with logical connective If...then...) of their truth values is denoted as pqp\to q and has a truth value F only when one of pp has a truth value T and qq has a truth value FF otherwise true. The truth table of pqp\to q is

ppqqpqp\to q
TTT
TFF
FTT
FFT

The statement with bi-implication (with logical connective if and only if ) of their truth values is denoted as pqp\leftrightarrow q and has a truth value T only when both pp and qq have truth value T or truth value FF, otherwise true. The truth table of pqp\leftrightarrow q is

ppqqpqp\leftrightarrow q
TTT
TFF
FTF
FFT

We use all these definitions to get the truth values in each option. We first find the truth values inside the bracket and then we find the truth values of whole composite statements. Let us denote the resultant statement in each option as ss.$$$$
The truth table for option A: s=(pq)( ~q ~p)s=\left( p\to q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( \tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p \right).

ppqq ~p\tilde{\ }p ~q\tilde{\ }qpqp\to q ~q ~p\tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }ps
TTFFTTT
TFFTFFT
FTTFTTT
FFTTTTT

So option A is not correct. Let us move to option-B where three statements are involved . So let t=(pq)(qr)t=\left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right) , s=[(pq)(qr)](pr)=t(pr)s=\left[ \left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right) \right]\to \left( p\to r \right)=t\to \left( p\to r \right) and draw the truth table .

ppqqrrpqp\to qqrq\to rprp\to rttss
TTTTTTTT
TTFTTTTF
TFTFTFFT
TFFFTFFT
FTTTFTFT
FTFTFTFT
FFTTTTTT
FFFTTTTT

So option B is not correct. We move to option C where s=( ~pq)(p ~q)s=\left( \tilde{\ }p\vee q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( p\to \tilde{\ }q \right)

ppqq ~p\tilde{\ }p ~q\tilde{\ }q ~pq\tilde{\ }p\vee qp ~qp\wedge \tilde{\ }qs
TTFFTFF
TFFTFTF
FTTFTFF
FFTTTFF

So option C is correct . We move to option D where s=p ~ps=p\to \tilde{\ }p

pp ~p\tilde{\ }pp ~pp\to \tilde{\ }p
TFT
FTF

So the only correct option is C. $$$$

Note: If the composite statement is always true then it is called a tautology and if the composite statement is always false it is called a fallacy. The statement  ~q ~p\tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p is the contrapositive of pqp\to q and qpq\to p is the converse of pqp\to q.