Question

Social forestry is
(A) Planting of different kinds of trees in the same area
(B) Greening of hills with the efforts of common men
(C) Raising trees on common village lands and other vacant areas of fodder, minor timber, and firewood
(D) None of the above

Answer 1

Social forestry is commonly known as the management and protection of the different forests and afforestation of barren lands with the purpose of helping environmental, social, and rural development, which will eventually help this earth to heal.

Complete answer: Social forestry is the management and protection of trees. It commonly includes planting trees in barren lands and deforested lands for social, environmental, and rural development. Social forestry is an approach for the conservation of forests. It involves planting trees on unused land. Afforestation can promote the development of rural areas intrinsically areas are dependent on fuelwood which may be obtained from natural sources only. to fulfill the increasing demand for fuelwood over time, afforestation and proper management of trees are important. This suggests that none of the given options is correct for social forestry.

Additional Information:
The social forestry scheme supports the people to boost plantations which might meet the growing demand for timber, fuelwood, fodder, etc., and thus they reduce the pressure on the forest areas that are traditional. This very useful and needed idea of village forests to satisfy the requirements of rural people had existed for hundreds of years across India. With the introduction of this scheme, the government formally recognized the rights of local communities to forest resources and encouraged rural participation within the management of natural resources.

So, the correct answer is ‘None of the above’.

Note: This term we are talking about i.e social forestry was first employed in 1976 by The National Commission on Agriculture when the government of India aimed to cut back pressure on forests by planting trees on all unused and fallow lands. It had been intended as a democratic approach to conserving the forest and usage, maximizing land utilization for multiple purposes.