Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Maxima of light of wavelength $\lambda$ is observed in thin film interference for reflection. Now th...

Maxima of light of wavelength λ\lambda is observed in thin film interference for reflection. Now the thickness of film is slowly increased by Δx=1\Delta x = 1 nm such that wavelength is observed to be absent for the first time in reflection spectra. Refractive index of film 1.5 then wavelength of light is N nm then N is

Answer

6

Explanation

Solution

The condition for constructive interference (maxima) in reflected light from a thin film, considering a phase change of π\pi at one interface, is given by: 2μtcosr=(m+1/2)λ2 \mu t \cos r = (m + 1/2) \lambda where μ\mu is the refractive index of the film, tt is its thickness, rr is the angle of refraction, λ\lambda is the wavelength of light, and mm is an integer (m=0,1,2,...m = 0, 1, 2, ...).

The condition for destructive interference (minima) is: 2μtcosr=mλ2 \mu t \cos r = m' \lambda where mm' is an integer (m=1,2,3,...m' = 1, 2, 3, ...).

Assuming normal incidence, cosr=1\cos r = 1. The equations become: Maxima: 2μt=(m+1/2)λ2 \mu t = (m + 1/2) \lambda Minima: 2μt=mλ2 \mu t = m' \lambda

Let the initial thickness be tt. A maximum is observed for wavelength λ\lambda. 2μt=(m+1/2)λ2 \mu t = (m + 1/2) \lambda for some integer m0m \ge 0.

The thickness is increased by Δx=1\Delta x = 1 nm, so the new thickness is t=t+Δxt' = t + \Delta x. For this new thickness, the wavelength λ\lambda is absent for the first time, meaning it corresponds to the first minimum encountered after the initial maximum. The sequence of conditions for 2μt/λ2\mu t/\lambda as thickness increases is: Maxima: 0.5,1.5,2.5,3.5,0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, \ldots (corresponding to m=0,1,2,3,m=0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots) Minima: 1,2,3,4,1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots (corresponding to m=1,2,3,4,m'=1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots)

If the initial maximum is of order mm, the very next condition is a minimum of order m=m+1m' = m+1. So, for the new thickness tt': 2μ(t+Δx)=(m+1)λ2 \mu (t + \Delta x) = (m+1) \lambda

Subtracting the initial condition from the new condition: 2μ(t+Δx)2μt=(m+1)λ(m+1/2)λ2 \mu (t + \Delta x) - 2 \mu t = (m+1) \lambda - (m + 1/2) \lambda 2μΔx=(m+1m1/2)λ2 \mu \Delta x = (m+1 - m - 1/2) \lambda 2μΔx=(11/2)λ2 \mu \Delta x = (1 - 1/2) \lambda 2μΔx=12λ2 \mu \Delta x = \frac{1}{2} \lambda

We are given: Refractive index of film, μ=1.5\mu = 1.5 Increase in thickness, Δx=1\Delta x = 1 nm The original wavelength, λ=N\lambda = N nm

Substitute these values into the derived equation: 2×(1.5)×(1 nm)=12×(N nm)2 \times (1.5) \times (1 \text{ nm}) = \frac{1}{2} \times (N \text{ nm}) 3 nm=N2 nm3 \text{ nm} = \frac{N}{2} \text{ nm} N=3×2N = 3 \times 2 N=6N = 6

Thus, the wavelength of light is 6 nm.