Question
Question: A hydrogen atom in its ground state absorbs 10.2 eV of energy. What is the orbital angular momentum ...
A hydrogen atom in its ground state absorbs 10.2 eV of energy. What is the orbital angular momentum increased by?

2\sqrt{3}\hbar
4\sqrt{3}\hbar
\sqrt{5}\hbar
\sqrt{3}\hbar
None of the above. The question is flawed.
Solution
-
Energy Calculation: A hydrogen atom in its ground state (n=1) has an energy of E1=−13.6 eV. Upon absorbing 10.2 eV, its final energy becomes Ef=−13.6+10.2=−3.4 eV. This corresponds to the n=2 energy level (E2=−13.6/22=−3.4 eV). So, the electron transitions from n=1 to n=2.
-
Orbital Angular Momentum:
- In the ground state (n=1), the only possible orbital angular momentum quantum number is l=0. The orbital angular momentum is L1=l(l+1)ℏ=0(0+1)ℏ=0.
- In the n=2 state, possible orbital angular momentum quantum numbers are l=0 (2s orbital) and l=1 (2p orbital).
- If the electron transitions to a 2s state (l=0), L2s=0(0+1)ℏ=0. The increase in angular momentum is 0−0=0.
- If the electron transitions to a 2p state (l=1), L2p=1(1+1)ℏ=2ℏ. The increase in angular momentum is 2ℏ−0=2ℏ.
-
Comparison with Options: The calculated increases are 0 or 2ℏ. None of the given options (23ℏ, 43ℏ, 5ℏ, 3ℏ) match these values. Furthermore, some options like 3ℏ and 5ℏ do not correspond to valid orbital angular momentum magnitudes l(l+1)ℏ for any integer value of l. The option 23ℏ corresponds to l=3, which is not possible for an electron in the n=2 state (lmax=n−1=2−1=1).
-
Conclusion: Based on standard quantum mechanics, this question's options are inconsistent with the problem statement. The question is flawed.
However, if we consider the approach from a similar question where the Bohr model's angular momentum quantization (Ln=nℏ) was used:
- L1=1ℏ
- L2=2ℏ
- Increase ΔL=L2−L1=2ℏ−1ℏ=ℏ.
Even with the Bohr model, ℏ is not among the given options.
Given the mandatory requirement to select an option, and the logical inconsistencies, this question is problematic. Without further clarification or context, selecting a correct option is not possible through derivation from standard physics principles.