Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: A hydrogen atom in its ground state absorbs 10.2 eV of energy. What is the orbital angular momentum ...

A hydrogen atom in its ground state absorbs 10.2 eV of energy. What is the orbital angular momentum increased by?

A

2\sqrt{3}\hbar

B

4\sqrt{3}\hbar

C

\sqrt{5}\hbar

D

\sqrt{3}\hbar

Answer

None of the above. The question is flawed.

Explanation

Solution

  1. Energy Calculation: A hydrogen atom in its ground state (n=1) has an energy of E1=13.6E_1 = -13.6 eV. Upon absorbing 10.2 eV, its final energy becomes Ef=13.6+10.2=3.4E_f = -13.6 + 10.2 = -3.4 eV. This corresponds to the n=2 energy level (E2=13.6/22=3.4E_2 = -13.6/2^2 = -3.4 eV). So, the electron transitions from n=1 to n=2.

  2. Orbital Angular Momentum:

    • In the ground state (n=1), the only possible orbital angular momentum quantum number is l=0. The orbital angular momentum is L1=l(l+1)=0(0+1)=0L_1 = \sqrt{l(l+1)}\hbar = \sqrt{0(0+1)}\hbar = 0.
    • In the n=2 state, possible orbital angular momentum quantum numbers are l=0 (2s orbital) and l=1 (2p orbital).
      • If the electron transitions to a 2s state (l=0), L2s=0(0+1)=0L_{2s} = \sqrt{0(0+1)}\hbar = 0. The increase in angular momentum is 00=00 - 0 = 0.
      • If the electron transitions to a 2p state (l=1), L2p=1(1+1)=2L_{2p} = \sqrt{1(1+1)}\hbar = \sqrt{2}\hbar. The increase in angular momentum is 20=2\sqrt{2}\hbar - 0 = \sqrt{2}\hbar.
  3. Comparison with Options: The calculated increases are 0 or 2\sqrt{2}\hbar. None of the given options (232\sqrt{3}\hbar, 434\sqrt{3}\hbar, 5\sqrt{5}\hbar, 3\sqrt{3}\hbar) match these values. Furthermore, some options like 3\sqrt{3}\hbar and 5\sqrt{5}\hbar do not correspond to valid orbital angular momentum magnitudes l(l+1)\sqrt{l(l+1)}\hbar for any integer value of ll. The option 232\sqrt{3}\hbar corresponds to l=3l=3, which is not possible for an electron in the n=2 state (lmax=n1=21=1l_{max} = n-1 = 2-1 = 1).

  4. Conclusion: Based on standard quantum mechanics, this question's options are inconsistent with the problem statement. The question is flawed.

However, if we consider the approach from a similar question where the Bohr model's angular momentum quantization (Ln=nL_n = n\hbar) was used:

  • L1=1L_1 = 1\hbar
  • L2=2L_2 = 2\hbar
  • Increase ΔL=L2L1=21=\Delta L = L_2 - L_1 = 2\hbar - 1\hbar = \hbar.

Even with the Bohr model, \hbar is not among the given options.

Given the mandatory requirement to select an option, and the logical inconsistencies, this question is problematic. Without further clarification or context, selecting a correct option is not possible through derivation from standard physics principles.