Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Quarter part of a transparent cylinder ABC of radius \[R\] is kept on a horizontal floor and a horiz...

Quarter part of a transparent cylinder ABC of radius RR is kept on a horizontal floor and a horizontal beam of light falls on the cylinder in the two different arrangements of the cylinder as shown in the figure (a) and (b). in arrangement (a) light converges at point D, which is at a distance 2R/m2R/m from B and in arrangement (b) light converges at point E, which is at a distance 2R/(m1)2R/\left( {m - 1} \right) from C. find out the refractive index of the material.
(A)

(B)

Explanation

Solution

Since the light rays are parallel to each other, then object distance can be regarded as infinity. The point of focus of the ray is the image distance.
Formula used: In this solution we will be using the following formulae;
nv1u=n1R\dfrac{n}{v} - \dfrac{1}{u} = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R}where nn is the refractive index of the glass, vv is the image distance, and uu is the object distance in the first case, RR is the radius of the glass, this is a thick lens equation for light striking the curve surface the Plano-convex.
1vnu=1nR\dfrac{1}{v} - \dfrac{n}{u} = \dfrac{{1 - n}}{R} this is the thick lens equation for when incident light strikes the flat surface of a Plano-convex lens.

Complete Step-by-Step solution:
For the first case, the light is incident on the curve side, hence, the governing equation can be given be given by
nv11u1=n1R\dfrac{n}{{{v_1}}} - \dfrac{1}{{{u_1}}} = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R} where nn is the refractive index of the glass, v1{v_1} is the image distance in the first case, and u1{u_1} is the object distance in the first case, RR is the radius of the glass.
Since the light rays were parallel to each other, then the object distance can be regarded as infinity, hence
nv11=n1R\dfrac{n}{{{v_1}}} - \dfrac{1}{\infty } = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R}
nv1=n1R\Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{{{v_1}}} = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R}
The point of convergence is the image distance, hence as given in question
n2Rm=n1R\dfrac{n}{{\dfrac{{2R}}{m}}} = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R}
Hence, by simplifying and cancelling RR we have
mn=2(n1)mn = 2\left( {n - 1} \right)
For the second case, the light is incident on the flat part of the glass, hence, the governing equation is given by
1v2nu2=1nR\dfrac{1}{{{v_2}}} - \dfrac{n}{{{u_2}}} = \dfrac{{1 - n}}{R}
Hence, since light is parallel again, and the point of convergence is Rm1\dfrac{R}{{m - 1}}, hence, by substitution, we have
1Rm1n=1nR\dfrac{1}{{\dfrac{R}{{m - 1}}}} - \dfrac{n}{\infty } = \dfrac{{1 - n}}{R}
By simplifying, we get
m1R=1nR\dfrac{{m - 1}}{R} = \dfrac{{1 - n}}{{ - R}}
m1=1n\Rightarrow m - 1 = 1 - n
Then, we see that
m=2nm = 2 - n
Inserting this expression into the equation mn=2(n1)mn = 2\left( {n - 1} \right), we get
(2n)n=2(n1)\left( {2 - n} \right)n = 2\left( {n - 1} \right)
2nn2=2n2\Rightarrow 2n - {n^2} = 2n - 2
By cancelling and simplifying, we get
n2=2{n^2} = 2
n=1.4\Rightarrow n = 1.4

Note: For clarity, observe that the equation nv1u=n1R\dfrac{n}{v} - \dfrac{1}{u} = \dfrac{{n - 1}}{R}, for example, is very similar to the lens maker equation 1f=n1(1R1+1R2)\dfrac{1}{f} = n - 1\left( {\dfrac{1}{{{R_1}}} + \dfrac{1}{{{R_2}}}} \right). But since the surface is flat, we have that one of the radius be equal to infinity reducing the equation to 1f=n1(1R1)\dfrac{1}{f} = n - 1\left( {\dfrac{1}{{{R_1}}}} \right) then 1f\dfrac{1}{f} can be proven to be nv1u\dfrac{n}{v} - \dfrac{1}{u}. Similar case for the second equation.