Question
Question: Prove that the greatest integer function defined by \(f(x) = \left[ x \right],0 < x < 3\) is not dif...
Prove that the greatest integer function defined by f(x)=[x],0<x<3 is not differentiable at x = 1 and x = 2.
Solution
To show that the functions are not differentiable at the given points we need to prove that they not continuous at the given points using the condition x→x−limf(x)=x→x+limf(x)
Complete step-by-step answer:
We know that a function is differentiable only if it is continuous .
So it is enough if we prove that the function is not continuous at x = 1 and x = 2
For a function to be continuous the left hand derivative must be equal to the right hand derivative
That is , x→x−limf(x)=x→x+limf(x)
So let's check the continuity at x = 1
⇒x→1−limf(x)=x→1−lim[0]=0
⇒x→1+limf(x)=x→1+lim[1]=1
Hence we can see that x→x−limf(x)=x→x+limf(x)
Hence it is not continuous at x = 1
Hence it is not differentiable at x = 2
So let's check the continuity at x = 2
⇒x→2−limf(x)=x→2−lim[1]=1
⇒x→2+limf(x)=x→2+lim[2]=2
Hence we can see that x→x−limf(x)=x→x+limf(x)
Hence it is not continuous at x = 2
Hence it is not differentiable at x = 2
Therefore it is proved that the function is not differentiable at x = 1 and x = 2.
Note: Continuity of a function is the characteristic of a function by virtue of which, the graphical form of that function is a continuous wave. A differentiable function is a function whose derivative exists at each point in its domain.
Every differentiable function is continuous but that doesn’t mean all the continuous functions are differentiable