Question
Question: Prove that \( 7\log \dfrac{{16}}{{15}} + 5\log \dfrac{{25}}{{24}} + 3\log \dfrac{{81}}{{80}} = \log ...
Prove that 7log1516+5log2425+3log8081=log2
Solution
Hint : In order to prove the above equation , first take the left-hand side of the equation. Simplify the LHS by first separating all the terms using rule logb(nm)=logb(m)−logb(n) . Now open the brackets and combine all the terms, and you will get the answer which is equal to RHS of the equation. Hence proved.
Complete step-by-step answer :
To Prove: 7log1516+5log2425+3log8081=log2
Proof:
In order to prove the above logarithmic expression,
Taking Left-Hand side (LHS)
LHS=7log1516+5log2425+3log8081
To simplify the above expression, we must know the properties of logarithms and with the help of them we are going to rewriting the above expression
Using the property of logarithm logb(nm)=logb(m)−logb(n) in all the three terms we get
=7(log16−log15)+5(log25−log24)+3(log81−log80)
=7(log24−log(5×3))+5(log52−log(8×3))+3(log92−log(16×5)) =7(4log2−log3−log5)+5(2log5−log23−log3)+3(4log3−log24−log5) =28log2−7log3−7log5+10log5−15log2−5log3+12log3−12log2−3log5
Now combining all the like terms , we get
=28log2−15log2−12log2−7log3−5log3+12log3−7log5+10log5−3log5 =28log2−27log2−12log3+12log3+10log5−10log5 =log2
LHS=log2
Now Taking Right-hand side
RHS=log2
LHS=RHS
Hence proved
Note : 2. A logarithm is basically the reverse of a power or we can say when we calculate a logarithm of any number , we actually undo an exponentiation.
3.Any multiplication inside the logarithm can be transformed into addition of two separate logarithm values .
logb(mn)=logb(m)+logb(n)
4. Any division inside the logarithm can be transformed into subtraction of two separate logarithm values .
logb(nm)=logb(m)−logb(n)
5. Any exponent value on anything inside the logarithm can be transformed and moved out of the logarithm as a multiplier and vice versa.
nlogm=logmn
6. The above guidelines work just if the bases are the equivalent. For example, the expression logd(m)+logb(n) can't be improved, on the grounds that the bases (the "d" and the "b") are not the equivalent, similarly as x2 × y3 can't be disentangled on the grounds that the bases (the x and y) are not the equivalent.