Question
Question: Potential of point O in the given figure is $\frac{630}{47}KV$. Find K....
Potential of point O in the given figure is 47630KV. Find K.

20/7
Solution
The problem asks us to find the value of K, given the potential of point O in the circuit diagram. The potential of point O is given as 47630KV.
We will use Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) at node O. KCL states that the algebraic sum of currents entering a node (or leaving a node) is zero. Let VO be the potential at point O.
Let's analyze the currents leaving node O:
-
Current towards 50V source (I1): This current flows through the 5Ω resistor. I1=5VO−50
-
Current towards 30V source (I2): This current flows through the 3Ω resistor. I2=3VO−30
-
Current towards 40V source (I3): This current flows through the 4Ω resistor. I3=4VO−40
-
Current towards the right side (I4): This current flows from O through a 2Ω resistor to a node, let's call it A. The most reasonable interpretation of the right side of the circuit is that the 2Ω resistor and the 3A current source are in parallel between node A and node B, and then a 2Ω resistor connects node B to node D. Since node D is not connected to anything else and its potential is unknown, we assume it's a floating node. For a floating node, the current leaving it must be zero. So, the current flowing into node D, IBD=2VB−VD=0, which implies VB=VD.
Now, let's apply KCL at node B: The current from the 2Ω resistor between A and B is 2VA−VB. The current from the 3A current source is 3A (flowing from A to B). So, 2VA−VB+3=IBD=0. 2VA−VB=−3 VA−VB=−6 VA=VB−6
Now, let's apply KCL at node A: Current entering A from O is I4=2VO−VA. Current leaving A towards B through 2Ω resistor is 2VA−VB. Current leaving A towards B through 3A source is 3A. So, 2VO−VA=2VA−VB+3. Substitute 2VA−VB=−3: 2VO−VA=−3+3 2VO−VA=0 VO−VA=0⟹VA=VO.
Since VA=VO, the current I4=2VO−VA=2VO−VO=0. This means no current flows into the right side of the circuit from node O. This simplifies the problem significantly, as the right branch effectively contributes zero current to node O.
Now, apply KCL at node O, considering only the first three branches: I1+I2+I3=0 5VO−50+3VO−30+4VO−40=0
To eliminate denominators, multiply the entire equation by the least common multiple (LCM) of 5, 3, and 4, which is 60. 60(5VO−50)+60(3VO−30)+60(4VO−40)=0 12(VO−50)+20(VO−30)+15(VO−40)=0 12VO−600+20VO−600+15VO−600=0 Combine terms with VO: (12+20+15)VO−(600+600+600)=0 47VO−1800=0 47VO=1800 VO=471800V
The problem states that the potential of point O is 47630KV. We calculated VO=471800V. To compare, we need to convert units. 1KV=1000V. So, 47630KV=47630×1000V=47630000V.
This is a mismatch. Let's re-check the problem statement and the interpretation. Perhaps the "KV" in the problem statement was a typo and meant just "V". If so, K=1800/630. K=6301800=63180=720. This is not an integer.
Let's assume the given potential 47630KV is actually 47630×KV. So, VO=47630KV. We found VO=471800V. Equating the two expressions for VO: 47630K=471800 (assuming K is a dimensionless multiplier for the voltage in Volts, or if KV is meant as K * Volts) 630K=1800 K=6301800=63180 Divide by 9: K=720. This is not an integer.
Let's re-read "Potential of point O in the given figure is 47630KV". This means the value of potential is 47630 kiloVolts. It's not 47630×KV. The question asks to "Find K". This implies K is a part of the numerical value given, not a unit. So, the given potential is VO=47630×1000V=47630000V.
Our calculated value is VO=471800V. There seems to be a discrepancy between the calculated value and the given value. Let's re-verify the KCL equations and calculations. 12VO−600+20VO−600+15VO−600=0 47VO−1800=0 47VO=1800 VO=471800V. The calculation is correct.
The only way for the problem to make sense is if the "KV" unit in the problem statement was meant to imply that the value K is related to VO such that VO=47630×K. And the final unit for VO would be Volts. If VO=47630K Volts, then: 47630K=471800 630K=1800 K=6301800=63180=720. This is a rational number, but typically K is expected to be an integer in such problems.
Let's consider if the question meant the value of VO is 47630×1000 and we need to find K such that VO=K. This would be trivial. Or if VO=47KV and K is 630×1000.
Let's assume the question means that the potential at point O is 47630 Volts, and we need to find the value of K such that VO=K. This would mean K=47630. But this is not how the question is phrased.
The most common interpretation of "Potential of point O in the given figure is 47630KV. Find K." is that VO=47630×1000 Volts, and somewhere in the circuit, there's a parameter K that needs to be found. But there is no parameter K in the circuit diagram.
Given the phrasing "Potential of point O in the given figure is 47630KV. Find K.", it implies that the value 47630 is given in a specific unit (KV), and we need to find a numerical factor 'K' that relates to this value. It's highly probable that the question intends for the numerical value of VO to be K×47630 Volts (or some other form), and we need to find K.
Let's assume the given potential VO=47630×K0 Volts, where K0 is 1000 if the unit is KV. And we need to find K as a multiplier for the voltage. If the question is "Potential of point O is X V. Find K.", and X=47630K. Then 47630K=471800. K=6301800=63180=720.
If the question is "Potential of point O is K V. Find K.", and K=47630×1000. This is not how it is written.
Let's consider that the given potential is VO=47630KV=47630000V. And the question asks to find K, where K is a numerical factor in the answer. If the answer is K, and the potential is 47630KV, it implies the numerical value of VO is K times some base value. This is a poorly worded question if K is not part of the circuit. However, in competitive exams, sometimes questions are phrased like "The value of X is 5Y. Find Y." where Y is the calculated value.
Let's assume the question implies that the calculated potential VO is given as 47630KV. So, V_O_{calculated} = \frac{1800}{47} V. And V_O_{given} = \frac{630}{47} KV = \frac{630}{47} \times 1000 V = \frac{630000}{47} V. These two values are not equal. This suggests either a typo in the question's given value or a misinterpretation of the circuit.
Let's re-examine the circuit for alternative interpretations of the right side. The interpretation of the right side (2Ω || 3A source) between A and B, and D being floating, leads to VA=VO and I4=0. This is a very strong result. If this is true, then the problem is simply KCL at O for the first three branches.
What if D is grounded? VD=0. Then from KCL at B: 2VA−VB+3=2VB−0 VA−VB+6=VB VA+6=2VB (Eq 1')
From KCL at A: 2VO−VA=2VA−VB+3 VO−VA=VA−VB+6 VO+VB−6=2VA (Eq 2')
From (Eq 1'), VB=2VA+6. Substitute into (Eq 2'): VO+2VA+6−6=2VA 2VO+VA+6−12=4VA 2VO−6=3VA VA=32VO−6
Now, substitute VA into I4=2VO−VA: I4=2VO−32VO−6=233VO−(2VO−6)=6VO+6
Now, KCL at O: 5VO−50+3VO−30+4VO−40+6VO+6=0 Multiply by LCM of 5, 3, 4, 6 which is 60. 12(VO−50)+20(VO−30)+15(VO−40)+10(VO+6)=0 12VO−600+20VO−600+15VO−600+10VO+60=0 (12+20+15+10)VO−(600+600+600−60)=0 57VO−(1800−60)=0 57VO=1740 VO=571740 1740/57=30.526... This is not 471800.
This confirms that the assumption of D being floating is the most likely intended scenario for a solvable problem with a "nice" fraction. The result VO=471800V is robust under the assumption that D is floating and the current source is in parallel with the 2Ω resistor.
Given the problem statement "Potential of point O in the given figure is 47630KV. Find K.", it is highly probable that the question intends for the numerical value of the potential (in Volts) to be K×47630. So, VO=47630K Volts. We calculated VO=471800 Volts. Equating these two: 47630K=471800 630K=1800 K=6301800=63180 Divide numerator and denominator by 9: K=720
This is the most consistent interpretation given the numerical values. The "KV" unit in the problem statement might be a distractor or a poorly placed "K". If "KV" means kiloVolts, then the given potential is 47630000V, which does not match our calculation.
Final check of the interpretation of the right side: If VA=VO, then I4=0. The KCL at A was (VO−VA)/2=(VA−VB)/2+3. If VA=VO, then 0=(VO−VB)/2+3. (VO−VB)/2=−3. VO−VB=−6. VB=VO+6. From KCL at B, (VA−VB)/2+3=0 (since VB=VD implies current to D is 0). Substitute VA=VO: (VO−VB)/2+3=0. This is consistent with the previous step. So, the interpretation that I4=0 (and thus VA=VO) is self-consistent under the assumption that D is a floating node.
The value of K is 720.
The final answer is 720.
Explanation of the solution:
- Identify node O and the branches connected to it.
- Apply Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) at node O: The sum of currents leaving node O is zero.
- For the rightmost branch, assume the 2Ω resistor and 3A current source are in parallel between two intermediate nodes, A and B. Node D is a floating node, meaning no current leaves it (ID=0).
- Apply KCL at node B: Current from (A to B) through 2Ω + Current from 3A source = Current to D. This leads to 2VA−VB+3=0, so VA−VB=−6.
- Apply KCL at node A: Current from (O to A) through 2Ω = Current from (A to B) through 2Ω + Current from 3A source. This leads to 2VO−VA=2VA−VB+3.
- Substitute the result from KCL at B into KCL at A: 2VO−VA=−3+3=0. This implies VO−VA=0, so VA=VO.
- Since VA=VO, the current from O to A (I4) is zero. This means the rightmost branch does not draw any current from node O.
- Simplify KCL at node O by considering only the first three branches: 5VO−50+3VO−30+4VO−40=0.
- Solve for VO: Multiply by the LCM of 5, 3, 4 (which is 60) to clear denominators. 12(VO−50)+20(VO−30)+15(VO−40)=0 12VO−600+20VO−600+15VO−600=0 47VO−1800=0 VO=471800V.
- The problem states that the potential of point O is 47630KV. Interpreting this as VO=47630K Volts, and equating it to the calculated value: 47630K=471800 630K=1800 K=6301800=63180=720.
Answer: The value of K is 720.