Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: The statement "$ab = ac \Rightarrow b=c$" asserts that if the product of $a$ with $b$ is equal to th...

The statement "ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c" asserts that if the product of aa with bb is equal to the product of aa with cc, then bb must be equal to cc. This implication is false in general.

The provided derivation shows the reasoning: Starting with the equation: ab=acab = ac

Subtract acac from both sides: abac=0ab - ac = 0

Factor out the common term aa: a(bc)=0a(b-c) = 0

For the product of two quantities to be zero, at least one of the quantities must be zero. This leads to two possibilities:

  1. a=0a = 0
  2. bc=0b-c = 0 (which implies b=cb=c)

The implication "ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c" is only true if the second case (bc=0b-c=0) is the only possible outcome. However, the first case (a=0a=0) shows that this is not always true.

Counterexample: If a=0a=0, the equation a(bc)=0a(b-c)=0 becomes 0(bc)=00 \cdot (b-c) = 0, which simplifies to 0=00=0. This equation is true for any values of bb and cc. Therefore, if a=0a=0, bb does not necessarily have to be equal to cc.

For instance, let a=0a=0, b=5b=5, and c=10c=10. Then, ab=0×5=0ab = 0 \times 5 = 0. And ac=0×10=0ac = 0 \times 10 = 0. So, ab=acab = ac is true (0=00=0). However, bcb \neq c (5105 \neq 10). This counterexample demonstrates that the statement "ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c" is false.

The note "Do not cancel the common terms from both sides. We can cancel only if a is non zero" highlights the pitfall. Cancelling aa from ab=acab=ac (which is equivalent to dividing by aa) is only a valid operation if a0a \neq 0. If aa can be zero, then cancelling it would lead to an incorrect conclusion that b=cb=c always follows, ignoring the case where a=0a=0 and bcb \neq c.

The implication "ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c" holds true only under the condition that a0a \neq 0.


Explanation of the solution (minimal)

The statement ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c is false. Rearranging ab=acab=ac gives a(bc)=0a(b-c)=0. This implies a=0a=0 or bc=0b-c=0. If a=0a=0, bb need not equal cc (e.g., a=0,b=5,c=10a=0, b=5, c=10). The conclusion b=cb=c is only guaranteed if a0a \neq 0.

Answer

The statement is False.

Explanation

Solution

The statement ab=acb=cab = ac \Rightarrow b=c is false. Rearranging ab=acab=ac gives a(bc)=0a(b-c)=0. This implies a=0a=0 or bc=0b-c=0. If a=0a=0, bb need not equal cc (e.g., a=0,b=5,c=10a=0, b=5, c=10). The conclusion b=cb=c is only guaranteed if a0a \neq 0.