Question
Question: The kinetic energy of the entire string at $t=0$ is matched correctly in the following option....
The kinetic energy of the entire string at t=0 is matched correctly in the following option.

Zero
2a
8Lπ2Ta2
a
4L
4Lπ2Ta2
The kinetic energy of the entire string at t=0 for cases (I), (II), (III), and (IV) are 0, 4Lπ2Ta2, Lπ2Ta2, and 0 respectively. Based on List-II, (I) matches with (P), (II) matches with (U), and (IV) matches with (P). The value for (III) is not present in List-II.
Solution
The kinetic energy of a small element of the string of length dx at position x is dK=21dmv(x,t)2=21μ(∂t∂y)2dx, where μ is the linear mass density of the string.
The total kinetic energy of the string at time t is K(t)=∫0L21μ(∂t∂y)2dx.
The wave speed on the string is vw=μT. For a standing wave, the angular frequency ω and wave number k are related by ω=kvw=kμT. Thus, μ=ω2k2T.
Let's calculate K(0) for each case in List-I:
(I) y=asin(Lπx)cosωt. ∂t∂y=−aωsin(Lπx)sinωt. At t=0, ∂t∂y(x,0)=−aωsin(Lπx)sin(0)=0. K(0)=∫0L21μ(0)2dx=0. This matches with (P).
(II) y=asin(Lπx)sinωt. ∂t∂y=aωsin(Lπx)cosωt. At t=0, ∂t∂y(x,0)=aωsin(Lπx)cos(0)=aωsin(Lπx). K(0)=∫0L21μ(aωsin(Lπx))2dx=21μa2ω2∫0Lsin2(Lπx)dx. Using ∫0Lsin2(Lnπx)dx=2L for integer n≥1. K(0)=21μa2ω22L=41μa2ω2L. For this wave, the wave number is k=Lπ. So μ=ω2k2T=ω2(π/L)2T=ω2L2π2T. K(0)=41(ω2L2π2T)a2ω2L=4Lπ2Ta2. This matches with (U).
(III) y=asin(L2πx)sinωt. ∂t∂y=aωsin(L2πx)cosωt. At t=0, ∂t∂y(x,0)=aωsin(L2πx)cos(0)=aωsin(L2πx). K(0)=∫0L21μ(aωsin(L2πx))2dx=21μa2ω2∫0Lsin2(L2πx)dx. Using ∫0Lsin2(Lnπx)dx=2L for integer n≥1. K(0)=21μa2ω22L=41μa2ω2L. For this wave, the wave number is k=L2π. So μ=ω2k2T=ω2(2π/L)2T=ω2L24π2T. K(0)=41(ω2L24π2T)a2ω2L=Lπ2Ta2. This value is not present in List-II. Let's re-examine the problem and options. It is possible that the question intends to ask for the maximum kinetic energy or the total energy, or there might be an error in the options provided in List-II for case (III). Let's assume the question and options are correct and look for a potential misinterpretation or alternative calculation.
Let's check the potential energy at t=0 for case (III). y=asin(L2πx)sinωt. ∂x∂y=aL2πcos(L2πx)sinωt. At t=0, ∂x∂y(x,0)=aL2πcos(L2πx)sin(0)=0. The total potential energy at t=0 is U(0)=∫0L21T(∂x∂y(x,0))2dx=∫0L21T(0)2dx=0. For a standing wave, the total energy E=K(t)+U(t) is constant. The kinetic energy is maximum when the potential energy is minimum (which is 0) and vice versa. For a standing wave of the form y(x,t)=f(x)g(t), the kinetic energy is K(t)=∫0L21μf(x)2(g′(t))2dx and potential energy is U(t)=∫0L21T(f′(x))2g(t)2dx. For case (III), f(x)=asin(L2πx) and g(t)=sinωt. f′(x)=aL2πcos(L2πx) and g′(t)=ωcosωt. K(t)=∫0L21μa2sin2(L2πx)(ωcosωt)2dx=21μa2ω2cos2ωt∫0Lsin2(L2πx)dx=21μa2ω2cos2ωt2L=41μa2ω2Lcos2ωt. U(t)=∫0L21T(aL2πcos(L2πx))2(sinωt)2dx=21Ta2L24π2sin2ωt∫0Lcos2(L2πx)dx=21Ta2L24π2sin2ωt2L=Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt. Using μ=ω2k2T=ω2(2π/L)2T=ω2L24π2T, we have μω2=L24π2T. K(t)=41(L24π2T)a2Lcos2ωt=Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt. E=K(t)+U(t)=Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt+Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt=Lπ2Ta2(cos2ωt+sin2ωt)=Lπ2Ta2. The total energy is indeed Lπ2Ta2. At t=0, K(0)=Lπ2Ta2cos2(0)=Lπ2Ta2. U(0)=Lπ2Ta2sin2(0)=0. So, for case (III), K(0)=Lπ2Ta2. This is still not in the list.
Let's check case (II) again using the total energy approach. y=asin(Lπx)sinωt. k=Lπ. K(t)=41μa2ω2Lcos2ωt. μω2=k2T=(π/L)2T=L2π2T. K(t)=41(L2π2T)a2Lcos2ωt=4Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt. U(t)=∫0L21T(aLπcos(Lπx))2(sinωt)2dx=21Ta2L2π2sin2ωt∫0Lcos2(Lπx)dx=21Ta2L2π2sin2ωt2L=4Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt. E=K(t)+U(t)=4Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt+4Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt=4Lπ2Ta2. At t=0, K(0)=4Lπ2Ta2cos2(0)=4Lπ2Ta2. U(0)=4Lπ2Ta2sin2(0)=0. So, for case (II), K(0)=4Lπ2Ta2. This matches with (U).
Let's check case (I) using the total energy approach. y=asin(Lπx)cosωt. k=Lπ. K(t)=41μa2ω2Lsin2ωt=4Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt. U(t)=4Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt. E=K(t)+U(t)=4Lπ2Ta2. At t=0, K(0)=4Lπ2Ta2sin2(0)=0. U(0)=4Lπ2Ta2cos2(0)=4Lπ2Ta2. So, for case (I), K(0)=0. This matches with (P).
Let's check case (IV) using the total energy approach. y=asin(L2πx)cosωt. k=L2π. K(t)=41μa2ω2Lsin2ωt. μω2=k2T=(L2π)2T=L24π2T. K(t)=41(L24π2T)a2Lsin2ωt=Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt. U(t)=∫0L21T(aL2πcos(L2πx))2(cosωt)2dx=21Ta2L24π2cos2ωt∫0Lcos2(L2πx)dx=21Ta2L24π2cos2ωt2L=Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt. E=K(t)+U(t)=Lπ2Ta2sin2ωt+Lπ2Ta2cos2ωt=Lπ2Ta2. At t=0, K(0)=Lπ2Ta2sin2(0)=0. U(0)=Lπ2Ta2cos2(0)=Lπ2Ta2. So, for case (IV), K(0)=0. This matches with (P).
Summary of matches based on K(0): (I) - (P) (II) - (U) (III) - Lπ2Ta2 (not in list) (IV) - (P)
Let's reconsider the options in List-II. Perhaps (R) 8Lπ2Ta2 and (U) 4Lπ2Ta2 are related to the total energy or maximum kinetic energy. Maximum kinetic energy occurs when cos2ωt=1 (for sine time dependence) or sin2ωt=1 (for cosine time dependence). Maximum kinetic energy for (I) is 4Lπ2Ta2. Maximum kinetic energy for (II) is 4Lπ2Ta2. Maximum kinetic energy for (III) is Lπ2Ta2. Maximum kinetic energy for (IV) is Lπ2Ta2.
The total energy for (I) and (II) is 4Lπ2Ta2. This matches (U). The total energy for (III) and (IV) is Lπ2Ta2. This is not in the list.
Let's check if any option in List-II represents the maximum displacement (amplitude) or position of nodes/antinodes. (Q) 2a is half the amplitude. (S) a is the amplitude. (T) 4L is a position along the string. For the fundamental mode (n=1, k=π/L), x=L/4 is a point between a node and an antinode. For the second harmonic (n=2, k=2π/L), x=L/4 is an antinode position.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question or the options, specifically for case (III). If the question was asking for something else related to case (III), or if the formula for (R) or (U) was different.
Given the provided solution structure asks for the correct option number, this question is likely a single-choice question where an option lists the correct matchings for (I), (II), (III), and (IV). Since the options are not provided, we cannot definitively choose the correct option. However, based on our calculations: (I) matches with (P) (II) matches with (U) (IV) matches with (P)
Let's assume there is a match for (III) in the options. Let's recheck the calculation for (III) one more time. K(0)=41μa2ω2L. μ=ω2k2T where k=L2π. K(0)=41ω2(2π/L)2Ta2ω2L=41L24π2Ta2L=Lπ2Ta2.
Let's assume there is a typo in the wave equation for (III) or (IV). If (III) was y=asin(Lπx)sinωt, it would be the same as (II), giving K(0)=4Lπ2Ta2 (U). If (III) was y=asin(Lπx)cosωt, it would be the same as (I), giving K(0)=0 (P). If the wave number in (III) was different, e.g., k=π/(2L), it would not be a standing wave on a string fixed at both ends of length L.
Let's assume there is a typo in option (R) or (U). If (U) was Lπ2Ta2, then (III) would match with (U). But (II) matches with (U) as given. If (R) was Lπ2Ta2, then (III) would match with (R). If (R) was 4Lπ2Ta2, then (II) would match with (R) and (U) would be unused or incorrect.
Let's assume the question asks for something else for (III). What if it asks for the kinetic energy at a specific time? Or the potential energy at t=0? For (III), U(0)=0 (P). For (I), U(0)=4Lπ2Ta2 (U). For (II), U(0)=0 (P). For (IV), U(0)=Lπ2Ta2 (not in list).
Let's assume there is a typo in the question and for (III) the wave number is π/L instead of 2π/L. Then (III) is identical to (II) and K(0)=U. Let's assume there is a typo in option (R). If (R) was Lπ2Ta2, then (III) matches with (R).
Given that the question asks for a correct option from a set of matchings, and our derived match for (III) is not in the list, there is likely an error in the question or the provided options in List-II. However, if we must choose the best possible answer based on the options provided, and assuming there is a single correct option among the choices (which are not given), we would look for an option that contains (I)-(P), (II)-(U), and (IV)-(P). The matching for (III) in that option would likely correspond to one of the values in List-II, possibly indicating a typo in the question or the list.
Assuming the question intended to have a valid match for (III), and given the options (R) and (U), the value Lπ2Ta2 for (III) is 4×4Lπ2Ta2=4×(U). It is also 8×8Lπ2Ta2=8×(R). Neither (R) nor (U) match (III).
Let's assume, hypothetically, that one of the options for the full matching was (I)-(P), (II)-(U), (III)-(R), (IV)-(P). This would imply that K(0) for (III) is (R) 8Lπ2Ta2. This contradicts our calculation.
Let's assume, hypothetically, that one of the options for the full matching was (I)-(P), (II)-(U), (III)-(U), (IV)-(P). This would imply that K(0) for (III) is (U) 4Lπ2Ta2. This also contradicts our calculation.
Given the strong consistency of our calculation for (I), (II), and (IV) matching (P) and (U), and the inconsistency for (III), it is most likely that there is an error in the problem statement regarding case (III) or the options in List-II.