Question
Question: p: Every square is a rectangle. q: Every rhombus is a kite. The truth values of \(p\to q\ and\ p...
p: Every square is a rectangle.
q: Every rhombus is a kite.
The truth values of p→q and p↔q are _____ and _____ respectively.
A. F, F
B. T, F
C. F, T
D.T, T
Solution
Hint: Consider the two statements p and q. Prove that they both are true. if p and q are true then p→q also becomes true. If both are true p↔q also becomes true i.e. p implies q and q implies p.
Complete step-by-step answer:
p: Every square is a rectangle.
(i) A rectangle is a quadrilateral with all 4 angles 90∘.
From this definition, you can prove that the opposite sides are parallel and of the same lengths. A rectangle can be tall & thin, short & fat or all the sides can have the same length.
(ii) A square is a quadrilateral with all 4 angles right angles and all 4 sides of same length.
So a square is a special kind of rectangle, it is one where all the sides have the same length. Thus every square is a rectangle because it is a quadrilateral with all 4 angles right angles. However not every rectangle is a square, to be a square its sides must have the same length.
∴ p: Every square is a rectangle is true.
q: Every rhombus is a kite.
When all the angles are also 90∘ the kite will be square. The sum of its side, opposite angles are equal. Therefore the rhombus is symmetrical about each of its diagonals. So a rhombus can become a kite. The difference between a rhombus and kite is that a kite doesn’t always have 4 equal sides or 2 pairs of parallel sides like rhombus.
∴ Every rhombus is a kite, but every kite is not a rhombus.
∴ q is true.
So we found out that both p and q are true.
p→q is T, it means that p implies q.
Also we know that T↔T is true.
∴ p↔q is true, it means that p implies q and q implies p.
Hence the truth values of p→q and p↔q is T, T.
p | q | p→q | q→p |
---|---|---|---|
T | T | T | T |
T | F | F | T |
F | T | T | F |
F | F | T | T |
Note: If it was given,
p: Every rectangle is square.
q: Every kite is rhombus.
Then p→q would have been F.
As both the statements are wrong.
So, p↔q is false.
So, the value of p→q and p↔q becomes F, F or from the table of logical implication here p and q are T.
∴ p→q is T and q→pis T i.e. case 1 is true.