Question
Question: On treatment of \[100mL\] of \[0.1M\] solution of \[CoC{l_3}.6{H_2}O\] with excess \[AgN{O_3}\]; \[...
On treatment of 100mL of 0.1M solution of CoCl3.6H2O with excess AgNO3; 1.2×1022 ions are precipitated. The complex is:
A) [Co(H2O)3Cl3].2H2O
B) [Co(H2O)6]Cl3
C) [Co(H2O)5Cl]Cl2.H2O
D) [Co(H2O)4Cl]Cl2.H2O
Solution
Millimoles of AgNO3=6×10231.2×1022×1000=20
Millimoles of CoCl3⋅6H2O=0.1 × 100 = 10
∴Each mole of CoCl3⋅6H2Ogives two chloride particles.
\therefore $$$$\left[ {Co{{\left( {{H_2}O} \right)}_5}Cl} \right]C{l_2}\cdot{H_2}O
Complete step by step answer:
Complex comprises a focal atom or ion, which is normally metallic and is known as the coordination centre, and an encompassing exhibit of bound atoms or particles, that are thus known as ligands or complexing specialists. Many metal-containing mixes, particularly those of progress metals, are coordination complexes. A coordination complex whose middle is a metal particle is known as a metal complex of the d block element.
No of moles of CoCl3.6H2O in arrangement are -
n = M × V
n = 0.1 × 0.1
n=10−2
Absolute no of particles of Cl− in assumed complex –
n′=3×10−2
No of Cl− particles accelerated -
Np=(6.022×1023)(1.2×1022)
Np=2×10−2
No of Cl− particles unpredicted -
Nu=3×10−2−2×10−3
Nu=10−2
Avogadro’s number is 6.023×1023
1.2×1022 particles compare to 6.023×10231.2×1022=0.02 moles.
100 mL of 0.1M arrangement of CoCl3.6H2O relates to 1000mL/L100mL×0.1M=0.01moles.
0.01 moles of CoCl3.6H2O responds with excess AgNO3 to frame 0.02 moles of AgCl accelerate, which implies 0.01moles of Ag+and 0.01 moles of Cl− particles.
Consequently, from one particle of CoCl3.6H2O, one chlorine molecule is dislodged. Thus, the complex is
[Co(H2O)5Cl]Cl2.H2O as number of chloride particle outside co-appointment circle ought to be one.
Werner's Theory and it's impediment -
Hypothesizes of Werner's hypothesis
1. Metals show two sorts of linkages, Primary and Secondary.
2. Secondary valences are non-ionisable.
3. Primary valences are ordinarily ionisable.
4. The gatherings bound by the secondary linkages have spatial plans.
Impediments of Warner's hypothesis
1.Did not explain why just certain components have capacity to frame complexes
2.Gave no clarification for directional properties of bonds in coordination mixes.
3.Could not clarify the attractive and optical properties
Hence, the correct option is (D).
Note:
That is accelerated particles are twofold that of unprecipitated particles. This implies that out of 3,2 Cl− particles are out of the co-appointment circle.
Along these lines, the equation for a given complex is [Co(H2O)4Cl]Cl2.H2O.