Question
Question: \( N{F_3} \) is possible but \( N{F_5} \) is not, why?...
NF3 is possible but NF5 is not, why?
Solution
The existence can be explained by the size and number of valence electrons an atom has.
Valency: It is defined as the capacity of an atom to react and combine with a particular number of atoms of other elements.
Complete step by step answer:
First of all we will talk about halogens.
Halogens: Elements of group 17 is known as halogens. Examples of halogens are fluorine, chlorine bromine, iodine, astatine. They show the valency of −1 in most of their compounds.
Here we are given with molecules NF3 and NF5 .
Valency: It is defined as the capacity of an atom to react and combine with a particular number of atoms of other elements.
Now in these molecules we have two atoms that are nitrogen and fluorine. Nitrogen is an element having atomic number 7 so its electronic configuration is as 1s2,2s22p3 means it has no vacant orbitals to show valency greater than 3 . In molecule NF3 the valency of fluorine is −1 and let us take the valency of nitrogen as x and as the molecule is neutral (having no charge) so the balance will be like x−3=0 . So x=+3 . Here the valency of nitrogen comes out as three so this molecule can exist. But in the molecule NF5 the valency of fluorine is −1 and let us take the valency of nitrogen as x and as the molecule is neutral (having no charge) so the balance will be like x−5=0 . So x=+5 . But due to absence of vacant orbitals nitrogen cannot show valency greater than three.
Hence NF3 is possible but NF5 is not.
Note:
For a given orbital maximum number of electrons it can hold is determined as 2(2l+1) where l is azimuthal quantum number. For s the value of l is zero, for p the value of l is one and so on. So the maximum number of electrons in s orbitals is two.