Question
Question: Let \({{z}_{1}}\) and \({{z}_{2}}\) be any two non-zero complex numbers such that \(3\left| {{z}_{1}...
Let z1 and z2 be any two non-zero complex numbers such that 3∣z1∣=4∣z2∣. If z=2z23z1+3z12z2 then?
A. ∣z∣=217
B. Re(z)=0
C. ∣z∣=25
D. Im(z)=0
Solution
In order to solve this question we have to manipulate the given equation 3∣z1∣=4∣z2∣. From this equation get the value of 2z23z1=2and after getting this as we know that from the Euler’s representation of a complex number, any complex number a can be represented as ∣a∣eiθ or ∣a∣cosθ+i∣a∣sinθ . Suppose that the x=2z23z1 then xcan be written as 2z23z1eiθi.e. 2eiθ. Now z can be written as x+x1 and then evaluate the value of z by putting x=2eiθ and then get the answer.
Complete step-by-step answer:
It is given that 3∣z1∣=4∣z2∣
Taking 2∣z2∣ in the LHS, we get
⇒2∣z2∣3∣z1∣=2
We can also write the above equation as 2z23z1=2
Let us assume that x=2z23z1.
Now as we know that from the Euler’s representation of a complex number, any complex number a can be represented as ∣a∣eiθ or ∣a∣cosθ+i∣a∣sinθ where θ the argument of a.
Hence, xcan also be represented as x=2z23z1eiθ=2eiθ
Similarly x1 can be represented as x1=2eiθ1=2e−iθ
Now it is given that z=2z23z1+3z12z2, putting the value x=2z23z1 in this equation, we get
⇒z=x+x1
Substituting the value of x=2eiθ and x1=2e−iθ in the above equation, we get
⇒z=2eiθ+2e−iθ
Now we know that eiθ=cosθ+isinθ and e−iθ=cosθ−isinθ, substituting both these in the above equation, we get
⇒z=2(cosθ+isinθ)+21(cosθ−isinθ)
⇒z=25cosθ+i23sinθ
Hence, the value of z is equal to 25cosθ+i23sinθ.
So, Re(z)=25cosθ=0 and Im(z)=23sinθ=0
Now, ∣z∣=(25)2+(23)2=425+49=434=217
So, the correct answer is “Option A”.
Note: This question is a typical example of Euler representation of a complex number. Students should note two things, first one is the given equation which is 3∣z1∣=4∣z2∣, we can rearrange it to get the modulus of the complex number 2z23z1. Second thing to notice that z is of the form x+x1 , so if we represent x=∣x∣eiθ then z can be easily found as z=x+x1=∣x∣eiθ+∣x∣e−iθ. Hence, as the modulus of x is known so we represented it like that rather than assuming x=a+ib and hence made the calculation a lot easier.