Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Let \(S\) be the set of all real numbers and let \(R\) be a relation in \(S\) defined by \(R=\left\\...

Let SS be the set of all real numbers and let RR be a relation in SS defined by R=\left\\{ \left( a,b \right):\left( 1+ab \right)>0 \right\\} . Show that RR is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.

Explanation

Solution

Hint:For solving this question we will consider some suitable examples for proving that relation R=\left\\{ \left( a,b \right):\left( 1+ab \right)>0 \right\\} is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive separately.

Complete step-by-step answer:
Given:
It is given that there is a SS of all real numbers and let RR be a relation in SS defined by R=\left\\{ \left( a,b \right):\left( 1+ab \right)>0 \right\\} . And we have to prove that RR is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
Now, we will prove that the given relation RR is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive one by one.
1. If a=ba=b where aa is any real number then ab=a2ab={{a}^{2}} and always 1+ab=1+a2>01+ab=1+{{a}^{2}}>0 as a2{{a}^{2}} will be always positive. Now, we can conclude that (a,a)R\left( a,a \right)\in R where aa is any real number from the set SS . Thus, the given relation is reflexive.

2. If aa and bb are any two different real numbers such that 1+ab>01+ab>0 which means that (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R then, (b,a)R\left( b,a \right)\in R always as 1+ba>01+ba>0 . Now, we can conclude that if (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R then we can say that (b,a)R\left( b,a \right)\in R always. Thus, if (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R then (b,a)R\left( b,a \right)\in R so, the given relation is symmetric.

3. If aa , bb and cc are three different real numbers such that 1+ab>01+ab>0 and 1+bc>01+bc>0 which means (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R and (b,c)R\left( b,c \right)\in R then, it not always necessary that 1+ac>01+ac>0 and we can understand this easily with the help of an example: take a=2a=-2 , b=0.25b=0.25 and c=3c=3 then, 1+ab=10.5=0.5>01+ab=1-0.5=0.5>0 and 1+bc=1+0.75=1.75>01+bc=1+0.75=1.75>0 but 1+ac=16=5<01+ac=1-6=-5<0 so, 1+ac>01+ac>0 doesn’t hold. Now, we conclude that if (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R and (b,c)R\left( b,c \right)\in R then, it is not necessary that always (a,c)R\left( a,c \right)\in R . Thus, if (a,b)R\left( a,b \right)\in R and (b,c)R\left( b,c \right)\in R then (a,c)R\left( a,c \right)\notin R so, the given relation is not transitive.
Now, as we have proved that the given relation RR is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
Hence, proved.

Note: Here, the student must try to understand the relation given in the problem then prove that the relation is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive separately and don’t mix up their conditions with each other to avoid the confusion. Moreover, we should understand with the help of suitable examples for better clarity of the concept.