Question
Question: Let \(\mathbb{N}\) be the set of all natural numbers and let R be a relation on \(\mathbb{N}\times \...
Let N be the set of all natural numbers and let R be a relation on N×N, defined by
(a,b)R(c,d)⇔ad=bc.
Show that R is an equivalence relation in N×N.
Solution
Hint: Recall the definition of an equivalence relation. A relation is said to be an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. Prove that the given relation is reflexive, symmetric as well as transitive. Hence prove that the given relation is an equivalence relation.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Before solving the question, we need to understand what is an equivalence relation.
Reflexive relation: A relation R on a set “A” is said to be reflexive if ∀a∈A we have aRa.
Symmetric relation: A relation R on a set “A” is said to be symmetric if aRb⇒bRa
Transitive relation: A relation R on a set “A” is said to be transitive if aRb,bRc⇒aRc.
Equivalence relation: A relation R on a set “A” is said to be an equivalence relation if the relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Reflexivity: We have ∀(a,b)∈Z,a×b=b×a we have (a,b)R(a,b) and hence the relation is reflexive.
Symmetricity: We have (a,b)R(c,d)⇒ad=bc. Hence, we have cb=da⇒(c,d)R(a,b). Hence the relation is symmetric.
Transitivity: We have (a,b)R(c,d),(c,d)R(e,f)⇒ad=bc,cf=ed
Hence, we have
ad=bc (i)ed=cf (ii)
Dividing equation (i) by equation (ii), we get
edad=cfbc⇒ea=fb
Cross multiplying, we get
af=be⇒(a,b)R(e,f).
Hence, the relation is transitive.
Since the relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, the relation is an equivalence relation.
Note: Alternative solution:
Observe that if (a,b)R(c,d) then a:b::c:d
Since every ratio is proportional to itself, we have a:b::a:b⇒(a,b)R(a,b)
Hence the relation is reflexive.
We know that if a:b::c:d then c:d::a:b
Hence, we have (a,b)R(c,d)⇒(c,d)R(a,b)
Hence the relation is symmetric.
Also, we know that if a:b::c:d and c:d::e:f then a:b::e:f
Hence, we have (a,b)R(c,d),(c,d)R(e,f)⇒(a,b)R(e,f).
Hence the relation is transitive, and hence the relation is an equivalence relation.