Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Let f, g are two continuous and twice derivable functions such that f(0) = f(3) = 0; f(1).f(2) < 0; ...

Let f, g are two continuous and twice derivable functions such that f(0) = f(3) = 0; f(1).f(2) < 0; g(0) = g(3) = 0. Number of roots of equation f"(x).g(x) + f'(x).g'(x) = 0 in (-1,5) cannot be

A

2

B

3

C

4

D

5

Answer

2

Explanation

Solution

Let the given equation be f(x)g(x)+f(x)g(x)=0f''(x)g(x) + f'(x)g'(x) = 0.

This equation is the derivative of the product h(x)=f(x)g(x)h(x) = f'(x)g(x). So the equation is h(x)=0h'(x) = 0. We need to find the number of roots of h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in the interval (1,5)(-1, 5).

We are given that ff and gg are continuous and twice derivable functions. We are given f(0)=0f(0) = 0 and f(3)=0f(3) = 0. We are also given g(0)=0g(0) = 0 and g(3)=0g(3) = 0.

Let's evaluate h(x)=f(x)g(x)h(x) = f'(x)g(x) at x=0x=0 and x=3x=3. h(0)=f(0)g(0)=f(0)×0=0h(0) = f'(0)g(0) = f'(0) \times 0 = 0. h(3)=f(3)g(3)=f(3)×0=0h(3) = f'(3)g(3) = f'(3) \times 0 = 0.

Since h(x)h(x) is continuous in [0,3][0, 3] (as ff' and gg are continuous) and derivable in (0,3)(0, 3), and h(0)=h(3)=0h(0) = h(3) = 0, by Rolle's Theorem, there exists at least one root of h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in the interval (0,3)(0, 3).

Now consider the condition f(1)f(2)<0f(1)f(2) < 0. This means f(1)f(1) and f(2)f(2) have opposite signs. Since ff is continuous, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists at least one root of f(x)=0f(x) = 0 in the interval (1,2)(1, 2). Let's call this root r0r_0, so f(r0)=0f(r_0) = 0 for some r0(1,2)r_0 \in (1, 2).

Now we have three known roots of f(x)=0f(x) = 0: 00, r0(1,2)r_0 \in (1, 2), and 33. Since ff is continuous and derivable, we can apply Rolle's Theorem to f(x)f(x) on the intervals [0,r0][0, r_0] and [r0,3][r_0, 3].

  • In [0,r0][0, r_0], since f(0)=f(r0)=0f(0) = f(r_0) = 0, there exists at least one root of f(x)=0f'(x) = 0 in (0,r0)(0, r_0). Let's call it r1r_1. So f(r1)=0f'(r_1) = 0 for some r1(0,r0)r_1 \in (0, r_0).
  • In [r0,3][r_0, 3], since f(r0)=f(3)=0f(r_0) = f(3) = 0, there exists at least one root of f(x)=0f'(x) = 0 in (r0,3)(r_0, 3). Let's call it r2r_2. So f(r2)=0f'(r_2) = 0 for some r2(r0,3)r_2 \in (r_0, 3).

Since r0(1,2)r_0 \in (1, 2), we have 0<r1<r0<r2<30 < r_1 < r_0 < r_2 < 3. This implies r1r_1 and r2r_2 are distinct roots of f(x)=0f'(x) = 0 in the interval (0,3)(0, 3).

Now let's evaluate h(x)=f(x)g(x)h(x) = f'(x)g(x) at these roots of f(x)f'(x). h(r1)=f(r1)g(r1)=0×g(r1)=0h(r_1) = f'(r_1)g(r_1) = 0 \times g(r_1) = 0. h(r2)=f(r2)g(r2)=0×g(r2)=0h(r_2) = f'(r_2)g(r_2) = 0 \times g(r_2) = 0.

So we have found four points where h(x)h(x) is zero: 0,r1,r2,30, r_1, r_2, 3, where 0<r1<r2<30 < r_1 < r_2 < 3. h(0)=0h(0) = 0, h(r1)=0h(r_1) = 0, h(r2)=0h(r_2) = 0, h(3)=0h(3) = 0.

Applying Rolle's Theorem to h(x)h(x) on the intervals [0,r1][0, r_1], [r1,r2][r_1, r_2], and [r2,3][r_2, 3]:

  • In [0,r1][0, r_1], since h(0)=h(r1)=0h(0) = h(r_1) = 0, there exists at least one root of h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in (0,r1)(0, r_1). Let's call it c1c_1. c1(0,r1)c_1 \in (0, r_1).
  • In [r1,r2][r_1, r_2], since h(r1)=h(r2)=0h(r_1) = h(r_2) = 0, there exists at least one root of h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in (r1,r2)(r_1, r_2). Let's call it c2c_2. c2(r1,r2)c_2 \in (r_1, r_2).
  • In [r2,3][r_2, 3], since h(r2)=h(3)=0h(r_2) = h(3) = 0, there exists at least one root of h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in (r2,3)(r_2, 3). Let's call it c3c_3. c3(r2,3)c_3 \in (r_2, 3).

Since 0<r1<r2<30 < r_1 < r_2 < 3, the intervals (0,r1)(0, r_1), (r1,r2)(r_1, r_2), and (r2,3)(r_2, 3) are disjoint. Therefore, the roots c1,c2,c3c_1, c_2, c_3 are distinct. All these three roots are in the interval (0,3)(0, 3), which is a subset of (1,5)(-1, 5). Thus, there are at least 3 roots of the equation h(x)=0h'(x) = 0 in the interval (1,5)(-1, 5).

This means the number of roots cannot be 2.