Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: $\left(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}x[\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}]^{-1}-4\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1}\left(\f...

(k=1x[k+k+1]14(x2)1(dx3dx)(x2.025)2000bc2+1+2+2...)>0\left(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}x[\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}]^{-1}-4\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{dx^3}{dx}\right)}{(x-2.025)^{-2000}||b^{c^2+1}|+2|+2|...\infty} \right) > 0

(n=012xn!xn)((86x)(x25)12n=110n2)2025(x69)\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{12x}{n!}x^n\right)\left((8-6x)(x^2-5)^{\frac{1}{2}}\sum_{n=1}^{10}n^2\right)^{-2025}(x-69)

Answer

No solution

Explanation

Solution

Let's analyze the given inequality:

(k=1x[k+k+1]14(x2)1(dx3dx)(x2.025)2000bc2+1+2+2...)>0\left(\frac{\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}x[\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}]^{-1}-4\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{dx^3}{dx}\right)}{(x-2.025)^{-2000}||b^{c^2+1}|+2|+2|...\infty} \right) > 0

This inequality is of the form ND>0\frac{N}{D} > 0, which means either (N>0N>0 and D>0D>0) or (N<0N<0 and D<0D<0).

Let's analyze the numerator NN:

N=k=1x[k+k+1]14(x2)1(dx3dx)N = \prod_{k=1}^{\infty}x[\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}]^{-1}-4\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{dx^3}{dx}\right)

The term [k+k+1]1=1k+k+1[\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}]^{-1} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}}.

The infinite product is k=1xk+k+1\prod_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{x}{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}}. The terms xk+k+1\frac{x}{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}} approach 0 as kk \to \infty for any fixed xx. An infinite product (1+ak)\prod (1+a_k) converges if ak\sum a_k converges. The product bk\prod b_k converges if ln(bk)\sum \ln(b_k) converges. Here bk=xk+k+1b_k = \frac{x}{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}}. ln(bk)=ln(x)ln(k+k+1)\ln(b_k) = \ln(x) - \ln(\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}). As kk \to \infty, k+k+12k\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1} \approx 2\sqrt{k}. ln(k+k+1)ln(2k)=ln(2)+12ln(k)\ln(\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}) \approx \ln(2\sqrt{k}) = \ln(2) + \frac{1}{2}\ln(k). The sum ln(k)\sum \ln(k) diverges, so the sum ln(bk)\sum \ln(b_k) diverges for x0x \neq 0. The infinite product k=1xk+k+1\prod_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{x}{\sqrt{k}+\sqrt{k+1}} diverges for x0x \neq 0. If x=0x=0, the terms are 0 for k1k \ge 1, so the product is 0.

The second term in the numerator is 4(x2)1(dx3dx)-4\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{dx^3}{dx}\right).

(x2)1=2x\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^{-1} = \frac{2}{x}. This requires x0x \neq 0.

dx3dx=3x2\frac{dx^3}{dx} = 3x^2.

The second term is 4×2x×3x2=24x-4 \times \frac{2}{x} \times 3x^2 = -24x. This requires x0x \neq 0.

If x0x \neq 0, the infinite product diverges. If x=0x=0, the second term is undefined. The expression for the numerator is ill-defined for all xx.

Let's analyze the denominator DD:

D=(x2.025)2000bc2+1+2+2...D = (x-2.025)^{-2000}||b^{c^2+1}|+2|+2|...\infty

The term (x2.025)2000=1(x2.025)2000(x-2.025)^{-2000} = \frac{1}{(x-2.025)^{2000}}. This requires x2.025x \neq 2.025. Since the exponent 2000 is even, (x2.025)2000>0(x-2.025)^{2000} > 0 for x2.025x \neq 2.025.

The term bc2+1+2+2...||b^{c^2+1}|+2|+2|...\infty is a strange notation. Let y=bc2+10y = |b^{c^2+1}| \ge 0. The expression looks like an infinitely nested absolute value: y+2+2+2...|y+2|+2|+2|.... Let z0=yz_0 = y and zn+1=zn+2z_{n+1} = |z_n+2|.

Since y0y \ge 0, z1=y+2=y+22z_1 = |y+2| = y+2 \ge 2.

z2=z1+2=z1+24z_2 = |z_1+2| = z_1+2 \ge 4.

zn=zn1+2z_n = z_{n-1}+2 for n1n \ge 1. This is an arithmetic progression for n1n \ge 1: zn=z1+2(n1)=(y+2)+2(n1)=y+2nz_n = z_1 + 2(n-1) = (y+2) + 2(n-1) = y+2n.

The limit as nn \to \infty is \infty.

So the term bc2+1+2+2...||b^{c^2+1}|+2|+2|...\infty appears to represent infinity.

The denominator is D=1(x2.025)2000×D = \frac{1}{(x-2.025)^{2000}} \times \infty. For x2.025x \neq 2.025, (x2.025)2000(x-2.025)^{2000} is a finite positive number. Thus, the denominator is \infty for x2.025x \neq 2.025.

The inequality is ND>0\frac{N}{D} > 0. If D=D = \infty and NN is finite, then ND=0\frac{N}{D} = 0. The inequality 0>00 > 0 is false.

If NN is infinite and DD is infinite, the expression is indeterminate.

Given the structure of the problem, it is highly likely that there is a misunderstanding of the notation or a typo in the question. The infinite product in the numerator diverges, and the infinite nested term in the denominator appears to diverge. This makes the entire expression ill-defined in a standard mathematical context, leading to no possible solution for xx.

The second part of the question is just an expression:

(n=012xn!xn)((86x)(x25)12n=110n2)2025(x69)\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{12x}{n!}x^n\right)\left((8-6x)(x^2-5)^{\frac{1}{2}}\sum_{n=1}^{10}n^2\right)^{-2025}(x-69)

The first part of this expression is n=012xn!xn=12xn=0xnn!=12xex\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{12x}{n!}x^n = 12x \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!} = 12x e^x.

The sum n=110n2=10(10+1)(2×10+1)6=10×11×216=5×11×7=385\sum_{n=1}^{10}n^2 = \frac{10(10+1)(2 \times 10+1)}{6} = \frac{10 \times 11 \times 21}{6} = 5 \times 11 \times 7 = 385.

The expression becomes (12xex)((86x)(x25)12×385)2025(x69)(12xe^x) \left((8-6x)(x^2-5)^{\frac{1}{2}} \times 385\right)^{-2025}(x-69).

This is just an expression and doesn't provide any equation or inequality to solve in conjunction with the first part.

As the first inequality is ill-defined and has no standard mathematical solution, the problem as stated does not yield any values of xx that satisfy the condition. Assuming the problem is stated correctly, there is no solution.

However, in the context of exams like JEE/NEET, such ill-posed questions are rare. If this were a multiple-choice question and there was an option like "No solution" or "Empty set", that would be the answer based on the literal interpretation. If there are solution options, it might imply a non-standard interpretation of the notation or a significant typo. Without clarification or correction of the problem statement, a rigorous solution is impossible.

Since I am required to provide a solution, and assuming the problem is not fundamentally flawed but uses notation in an unconventional way or expects a specific interpretation not clear from the text, I cannot proceed further. However, if forced to choose, the most likely scenario is a misstatement of the problem.

Given the constraint to provide a step-by-step solution, and having determined that the problem is ill-posed under standard interpretation, I must conclude that there is no solution.