Question

In this question, two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider both the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions is/are definitely drawn from the given statements.
Statements :
In order to be selected for the local cricket team, a person should be either a good batsman or bowler.
Shyam is selected for the team.
Conclusions:
I. Shyam is a good batsman.
II. Shyam is not a good bowler.

• A. Only I follows
• B. Only II follows
• C. Neither I nor II follows
• D. Both I and II follow

Answer 1

Answer: (C)

Neither I nor II follows

Answer 2

In order to get selected in the team, a person should be either a good batsman or bowler

So, Shyam is a good batsman doesn't mean that he is a bad bowler. We know that he is only a good batsman and got selected in the team and vice versa that he is a good bowler doesn't mean he is a bad batsman so, both the conclusions will not follow.

The correct option is (C): Neither I nor II follows