Question
Question: If p(x) = 51x^{101} - 2323x^{100} - 45x + 1035, using Rolle's theorem, prove that at least one root ...
If p(x) = 51x^{101} - 2323x^{100} - 45x + 1035, using Rolle's theorem, prove that at least one root of p(x) lies between (45^{(1/100)}, 46). [JEE 2004]

The question is a proof based question and doesn't have options.
Solution
To prove that at least one root of p(x)=51x101−2323x100−45x+1035 lies between (45(1/100),46) using Rolle's theorem, we need to find an auxiliary function F(x) such that F′(x)=p(x) and then find two points a,b such that F(a)=F(b). If F(a)=F(b), Rolle's theorem guarantees that there is at least one root of F′(x)=p(x) in the interval (a,b).
Step 1: Find the anti-derivative of p(x).
Let F(x)=∫p(x)dx.
F(x)=∫(51x101−2323x100−45x+1035)dx
F(x)=10251x102−1012323x101−245x2+1035x+C
F(x)=21x102−23x101−245x2+1035x+C
Step 2: Find two values a and b such that F(a)=F(b).
Let's choose C=0 for simplicity, as the constant of integration will cancel out when comparing F(a) and F(b).
F(x)=21x102−23x101−245x2+1035x
We can factor out x:
F(x)=x(21x101−23x100−245x+1035)
Immediately, we see that F(0)=0. So, let a=0.
Now we need to find another value b such that F(b)=0. This means we need to find a root of the expression inside the parenthesis:
G(x)=21x101−23x100−245x+1035
Let's test x=46:
G(46)=21(46)101−23(46)100−245(46)+1035
G(46)=(46)100(21⋅46−23)−45⋅23+1035
G(46)=(46)100(23−23)−1035+1035
G(46)=(46)100(0)−0=0
So, x=46 is a root of G(x), which means F(46)=0. Let b=46.
Step 3: Apply Rolle's Theorem.
We have the function F(x)=21x102−23x101−245x2+1035x.
- F(x) is a polynomial, so it is continuous on the closed interval [0,46].
- F(x) is a polynomial, so it is differentiable on the open interval (0,46).
- We found F(0)=0 and F(46)=0, so F(0)=F(46).
According to Rolle's Theorem, there exists at least one value c∈(0,46) such that F′(c)=0.
Since F′(x)=p(x), this implies that there exists at least one root of p(x) in the interval (0,46).
Step 4: Refine the interval to (45(1/100),46).
We have established that a root c exists in (0,46). We need to show that this root (or another one) lies in (45(1/100),46). This means we need to show that there are no roots of p(x) in the interval (0,45(1/100)].
Let x0=45(1/100). We evaluate p(x0):
p(x)=51x101−2323x100−45x+1035
p(x0)=51x0101−2323x0100−45x0+1035
Since x0100=45:
p(x0)=51x0⋅(x0100)−2323(x0100)−45x0+1035
p(x0)=51x0⋅45−2323⋅45−45x0+1035
Factor out 45 from the first two terms and notice 1035=23×45:
p(x0)=45(51x0−2323−x0+23)
p(x0)=45(50x0−2300)
p(x0)=45×50(x0−46)
p(x0)=2250(x0−46)
Since x0=45(1/100), and 45<46, it implies 45(1/100)<46(1/100). Also, 46(1/100)<46 (because 46100>46). Thus, x0<46.
Therefore, (x0−46) is negative.
So, p(x0)=2250(x0−46)<0.
Now consider the interval [0,x0].
F(0)=0.
F(x0)=x0(21x0101−23x0100−245x0+1035)
F(x0)=x0(21x0⋅45−23⋅45−245x0+1035)
F(x0)=x0(245x0−1035−245x0+1035)
F(x0)=x0(0)=0.
So, we have F(0)=0 and F(45(1/100))=0.
Applying Rolle's Theorem to F(x) on the interval [0,45(1/100)]:
- F(x) is continuous on [0,45(1/100)].
- F(x) is differentiable on (0,45(1/100)).
- F(0)=F(45(1/100))=0.
Therefore, there exists at least one c1∈(0,45(1/100)) such that F′(c1)=p(c1)=0.
This means p(x) has a root in (0,45(1/100)).
However, the question asks to prove a root lies in (45(1/100),46). Let's re-examine.
We have F(0)=0 and F(46)=0. This implies there is a root c∈(0,46) for p(x).
We also found that p(45(1/100))<0.
And we previously calculated p(46)=23(46)100−1035. Since 46100 is a very large positive number, p(46)>0.
Since p(x) is a polynomial, it is continuous.
We have p(45(1/100))<0 and p(46)>0.
By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there must be at least one root of p(x) in the interval (45(1/100),46).
The problem explicitly asks to use Rolle's theorem. Let's reconsider the definition of Rolle's theorem.
If f(a)=f(b), then f′(c)=0 for some c∈(a,b).
We established that F(0)=0 and F(46)=0.
By Rolle's theorem, there exists c∈(0,46) such that p(c)=0.
Now, to prove that this root lies in (45(1/100),46), we need to show that p(x) does not have a root in (0,45(1/100)]. This is where the initial calculation of p(x0) comes in.
Let's assume there is a root c0 in (0,45(1/100)).
Consider the interval [c0,46].
We have p(c0)=0 and p(46)>0. This does not directly help with Rolle's theorem for p(x).
The standard application of Rolle's theorem for proving a root of p(x) in (a,b) is to find F(x) such that F′(x)=p(x) and F(a)=F(b).
We found F(0)=0 and F(46)=0. This guarantees a root c∈(0,46).
We also need to use the point 45(1/100). Let x0=45(1/100).
We found F(x0)=0.
So we have three roots for F(x): 0, x0, and 46.
Applying Rolle's Theorem:
- On the interval [0,x0]: Since F(0)=F(x0)=0, there exists at least one root c1∈(0,x0) such that p(c1)=0.
- On the interval [x0,46]: Since F(x0)=F(46)=0, there exists at least one root c2∈(x0,46) such that p(c2)=0.
The question asks to prove that at least one root of p(x) lies between (45(1/100),46).
The second application of Rolle's Theorem directly provides this: there exists at least one root c2∈(x0,46), i.e., c2∈(45(1/100),46).
Thus, by applying Rolle's theorem to the function F(x) on the interval [45(1/100),46], we can prove the statement.