Question
Question: If m parallel lines in a plane are intersected by a family of n parallel lines, the number of parall...
If m parallel lines in a plane are intersected by a family of n parallel lines, the number of parallelogram that can be formed is
a. 41mn(m−1)(n−1)
b. 21mn(m−1)(n−1)
c. 41m2n2
d. None of these
Solution
To solve this question, we should know that a parallelogram is formed of 2 pairs of parallel lines and to choose the 2 pairs of parallel lines, we will use the formula of combination which is used to choose r out of n items irrespective of their orders, that is, nCr=r!(n−r)!n!. By using these concepts we will solve this question.
Complete step-by-step answer:
In this question, we have been asked to find the number of parallelograms that can be formed when m parallel lines in a plane are intersected by a family of n parallel lines. To solve this question, we should know that when we have to choose r out of n items irrespective of their orders, so we will apply the formula of combination, that is nCr=r!(n−r)!n!. Now, we know that a parallelogram is formed by 2 pairs of parallel lines. So, to form the parallelogram from a given set of lines, we will choose 2 lines from m parallel lines and the other 2 from n parallel lines. So, by using the formula of combination, we can choose 2 out of m parallel lines as mC2 and 2 out of n parallel lines as nC2. Therefore, we can write the total number of parallelogram formed as, mC2×nC2. And by using the formula of combination, we can express it as,
2!(m−2)!m!×2!(n−2)!n!⇒(2×1)(m−2)!m(m−1)(m−2)!×(2×1)(n−2)!n(n−1)(n−2)!
In the above expression, the common terms in the numerator and the denominator of both the terms will get cancelled out. So, we get,
2m(m−1)×2n(n−1)⇒41mn(m−1)(n−1)
Hence, the total number of parallelograms that can be formed is 41mn(m−1)(n−1).
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Note: While solving this question, the possible mistake one can make is by writing the wrong formula for combination. The correct formula is nCr=r!(n−r)!n!. Also, we can solve this question by assuming the values of m and n but that can be a confusing method. So it is better to refer to the combination method.