Question
Question: If $\int_{\sqrt{3}}^{1}\frac{1}{\sqrt{3+x}+\sqrt{1+x}}dx = a + b\sqrt{2} + c\sqrt{3}$, where a, b, c...
If ∫313+x+1+x1dx=a+b2+c3, where a, b, c are rational numbers, then 2a + 3b - 4c is equal to

10
8
4
7
8
Solution
To solve the integral ∫313+x+1+x1dx, we first rationalize the integrand.
1. Rationalize the Integrand:
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, 3+x−1+x:
3+x+1+x1⋅3+x−1+x3+x−1+x=(3+x)−(1+x)3+x−1+x =23+x−1+x2. Evaluate the Definite Integral:
The integral becomes:
∫3123+x−1+xdx=21∫31(3+x−1+x)dxIntegrate each term using the power rule ∫(ax+b)ndx=a(n+1)(ax+b)n+1:
=21[3/2(3+x)3/2−3/2(1+x)3/2]31 =21⋅32[(3+x)3/2−(1+x)3/2]31 =31[(3+x)3/2−(1+x)3/2]31Let F(x)=31[(3+x)3/2−(1+x)3/2]. We need to evaluate F(1)−F(3).
Evaluate at the upper limit (x=1):
F(1)=31[(3+1)3/2−(1+1)3/2] =31[43/2−23/2] =31[(4)3−(2)3] =31[23−22] =31[8−22]Evaluate at the lower limit (x=3):
F(3)=31[(3+3)3/2−(1+3)3/2]We simplify these terms:
(3+3)3/2=(3(3+1))3/2=33/4(3+1)3/2This does not simplify to a form a+b2+c3 where a,b,c are rational numbers.
Given the structure of the problem (similar to a standard problem where limits lead to simple surds) and the constraint that a,b,c are rational numbers, it is highly probable that the limits of integration are intended to be swapped, i.e., from 1 to 3. If the limits are 1 to 3, the value of the integral would be F(3)−F(1). If the limits are 3 to 1, the value is F(1)−F(3).
Assuming the question intends for a result of the form a+b2+c3, there must be a simplification for x=3.
The terms (3+3)3/2 and (1+3)3/2 do not simplify to the form A+B2+C3. For instance, (3+3)3/2=(3+3)3+3. The term 3+3 cannot be expressed in the form p+q2+r3 for rational p,q,r.
This suggests an error in the question's provided limits.
If we assume the question meant ∫13 or ∫01 or some other limits that would yield a result in the specified form, we cannot proceed with the given limits and the specified form of a+b2+c3.
Let's assume, for the sake of completeness, that the question intends for the result to be derived from a similar structure as the provided similar question, which uses limits 0 to 1. If the limits were 0 to 1, the integral would be:
∫0121(3+x−1+x)dx=31[(3+x)3/2−(1+x)3/2]01 =31[(43/2−23/2)−(33/2−13/2)] =31[(8−22)−(33−1)] =31[9−22−33] =3−322−3Comparing this with a+b2+c3:
a=3, b=−32, c=−1.
Then, 2a+3b−4c=2(3)+3(−32)−4(−1)=6−2+4=8.
This matches option B.
Given that the problem is extremely similar to the "similar question" provided, and the "similar question" has limits 0 to 1, it is highly probable that there is a typo in the limits of the current question and it should be 0 to 1. If the limits are strictly 3 to 1, the result cannot be expressed in the form a+b2+c3 where a,b,c are rational numbers.
Therefore, we proceed assuming the limits were intended to be 0 to 1.
3. Identify a, b, c (assuming limits 0 to 1):
From 3−322−3=a+b2+c3:
a=3
b=−32
c=−1
4. Calculate 2a+3b−4c:
2a+3b−4c=2(3)+3(−32)−4(−1)
=6−2+4
=8
The final answer is 8.
The problem as stated (with limits 3 to 1) does not yield a result of the form a+b2+c3 with a,b,c rational. However, if we assume a typo in the limits and they were meant to be 0 to 1 (as in the very similar example), then the solution is straightforward. In a competitive exam scenario, if such an ambiguity arises, one typically assumes the problem intends for a well-defined solution of the specified form.
The final answer is 8.