Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: How do you prove that the limit of \[\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\;\] as \(x\) approaches -2 using...

How do you prove that the limit of (x21)=3  \left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\; as xx approaches -2 using the epsilon delta proof?

Explanation

Solution

Epsilon data proof:
In calculus, the εδ\varepsilon - \delta definition of a limit is an algebraically precise formulation of evaluating the limit of a function. The definition states that a limit LL of a function at a pointx0{x_0}exists if no matter how x0{x_0} ​ is approached, the values returned by the function will always approach LL.
Such that it can be written mathematically as:
Let f(x)f\left( x \right)be a function defined on an open interval aroundx0{x_0}. Such that we can say that the limit of f(x)f\left( x \right)asxx approaches x0{x_0}isLL.
limxx0f(x)=L\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to {x_0}} f\left( x \right) = L
Now for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that for allxx.
0<xx0<δf(x)L<ε0 < \left| {x - {x_0}} \right| < \delta \Rightarrow \left| {f\left( x \right) - L} \right| < \varepsilon
By using the above definitions and formulas we can solve the given question.

Complete step by step solution:
Given
The limit of (x21)=3    as x approaches 2.......................(i)\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\;{\text{\;as }}x{\text{ approaches }} - 2.......................\left( i \right)
So we need to prove the given statement using the epsilon delta proof.
For that we know that:
Now for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that for allxx.
0<xx0<δf(x)L<ε0 < \left| {x - {x_0}} \right| < \delta \Rightarrow \left| {f\left( x \right) - L} \right| < \varepsilon
Herex0=2{x_0} = - 2, so we can write:
0<x+2<δ  (x21)3<ε.......................(ii)0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\mid \Rightarrow \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon .......................\left( {ii} \right)
Now in order to find the limit we need to manipulate the term (x21)3<ε\left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon to find the value of x+2<\left| {x + 2} \right| < :
So we can write:

(x21)3<ε x24<ε (x+2)(x2)<ε (x+2)<ε(x2)  \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ \left| {{x^2} - 4} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ \left| {\left( {x + 2} \right)\left( {x - 2} \right)} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ \left| {\left( {x + 2} \right)} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{{\left( {x - 2} \right)}} \\\

Now we know that we cannot have a xx term with ε\varepsilon .
Let us assume δ=1  \delta = 1\; and then solve x+2  x + 2\;.
Such that:

0<x+2<1 \-1<x+2<1 \-14<x+24<14 \-5<x2<\-3.......................(iii)  0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < 1 \\\ \- 1 < x + 2 < 1 \\\ \- 1 - 4 < x + 2 - 4 < 1 - 4 \\\ \- 5 < x - 2 < \- 3.......................\left( {iii} \right) \\\

Now on analyzing (iii) if we chose the smaller value, the -5 would not be included, so let:

x2<5 x2<ε5.......................(iv)  \left| {x - 2} \right| < 5 \\\ \therefore \left| {x - 2} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{5}.......................\left( {iv} \right) \\\

Now from (ii) we can write:
For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that for allxx.
0<x+2<δ  (x21)3<ε0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\mid \Rightarrow \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon
Also we have got
0<x+2<δ    and  δ = min(1,ε5)0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\;{\text{and}}\;\delta {\text{ = min}}\left( {1,\dfrac{\varepsilon }{5}} \right)
Such that (ii) can be written as:

0<x+2<ε5 0<5x+2<ε 0<x2x+2<ε 0<x24<ε 0<(x21)3<ε limx2(x21)=3...........................(v)  0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{5} \\\ 0 < 5\left| {x + 2} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ 0 < \left| {x - 2} \right|\left| {x + 2} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ 0 < \left| {{x^2} - 4} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ 0 < \left| {\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \\\ \therefore \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to - 2} \left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3...........................\left( v \right) \\\

Hence the proved limit of (x21)=3  \left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\; as xx approaches -2 using the epsilon delta proof.

Note:
Also while approaching a question involving proofs one should keep in mind that one should work with one side at a time and manipulate it to the other side. The most straightforward way to do this is to simplify one side to the other directly, but we can also transform both sides to a common expression if we see no direct way to connect the two.