Question
Question: Heights of transmitting and receiving antennas from earth surface are \[{h_t}\] and \[{h_R}\] respec...
Heights of transmitting and receiving antennas from earth surface are ht and hR respectively. Write the relation for the maximum line of sight (LOS) distance between two antennas.
Solution
The maximum line of sight is the maximum distance between the transmitting and the receiving antenna beyond which they would no longer be able to send or receive signals from one another. The curvature of the earth is what causes the distance to be finite i.e. a flat earth would have no maximum line of sight.
Formula used: In this solution we will be using the following formula;
hyp2=opp2+adj2 where hyp is the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle, opp is the opposite side and adj is the adjacent side
Complete Step-by-Step Solution:
We shall draw two antennae on the surface of a round earth as shown in the figure
The maximum line of sight by diagram is given by
S=xt+xr
From Pythagoras theorem which states that
hyp2=opp2+adj2 where hyp is the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle, opp is the opposite side and adj is the adjacent side
Hence,
(R+ht)2=R2+xt2
⇒xt2=(R+ht)2−R2
By opening the bracket and subtracting in the right hand side, we have
xt2=R2+ht2+2htR−R2
⇒xt2=ht2+2htR
Now, if the height of the transmission antennae is taken to be small with respect to the radius of the earth, then the square of the height can be dropped as in
For ht<<R. Then ht2+2htR=2htR.
Then the transmission antennae height can be given as
xt2=2htR,
By finding the square root of both sides, we have
xt=2htR
Similarly, for the receiving antennae, we have that
xr=2hRR.
Then, the maximum line of sight is given by
S=xt+xr=2htR+2hRR
Note: For clarity, the dropping of the square of the height can be justified through the following analysis; The equation ht2+2htR can be written as R2(R2h2+R2h), now since, the height is small relative to the radius of the earth, then Rh<<0. Now, from maths, we observe that when a number is less than zero, then the square of the number is even far less than zero. Hence, the first term in the bracket (Rh)2→0 and hence can be neglected. If we multiply R2, we have
R2(0+R2hR)
⇒2hR