Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: for a small positive coefficient of expansion in case of solid : then comment on Cp and Cv...

for a small positive coefficient of expansion in case of solid : then comment on Cp and Cv

Answer

Cp is slightly greater than Cv

Explanation

Solution

For a solid, the relationship between the molar heat capacities at constant pressure (CpC_p) and constant volume (CvC_v) is given by the thermodynamic relation:

CpCv=α2VTβTC_p - C_v = \frac{\alpha^2 V T}{\beta_T}

where: α\alpha is the coefficient of volume expansion. VV is the molar volume. TT is the absolute temperature. βT\beta_T is the isothermal compressibility, defined as βT=1V(VP)T\beta_T = -\frac{1}{V} \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P}\right)_T.

For a typical solid at a positive absolute temperature T>0T > 0, the molar volume V>0V > 0, and the isothermal compressibility βT>0\beta_T > 0 (solids are compressible, and increasing pressure decreases volume, so (V/P)T(\partial V / \partial P)_T is negative).

The question states that the solid has a small positive coefficient of expansion. This means α\alpha is positive (α>0\alpha > 0) and small. Since α\alpha is positive, α2\alpha^2 is also positive (α2>0\alpha^2 > 0). Given that V>0V > 0, T>0T > 0, and βT>0\beta_T > 0, the term α2VTβT\frac{\alpha^2 V T}{\beta_T} is positive. Therefore, CpCv>0C_p - C_v > 0, which implies Cp>CvC_p > C_v.

Furthermore, the question states that the coefficient of expansion α\alpha is small. The difference CpCvC_p - C_v is proportional to α2\alpha^2. If α\alpha is small, then α2\alpha^2 is very small. Thus, the difference CpCvC_p - C_v is small.

Combining these two points, CpC_p is greater than CvC_v, and the difference is small. So, CpC_p is slightly greater than CvC_v.

This is consistent with the physical understanding that the difference CpC_p - C_v arises from the work done during expansion against the external pressure when heat is supplied at constant pressure. For solids, the expansion upon heating is generally small compared to gases, leading to a smaller difference between CpC_p and CvC_v. If the coefficient of expansion is explicitly stated to be small, this difference will be particularly small.

The comment on CpC_p and CvC_v is that CpC_p is slightly greater than CvC_v.