Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Find the final DFA (Deterministic Finite Automata) by performing the DFA minimization process....

Find the final DFA (Deterministic Finite Automata) by performing the DFA minimization process.

Answer

The final minimized DFA is given by the transition table above.

Explanation

Solution

The process of DFA minimization involves identifying and merging equivalent states. We use the table-filling algorithm (also known as the Myhill-Nerode theorem based approach) to achieve this.

Given DFA Transition Table:

State/input01
->q₀q₁q₀
q₁q₀q₂
q₂q₃q₁
q₃*q₃q₀
q₄q₃q₅
q₅q₆q₄
q₆q₅q₆
q₇q₆q₃

Initial state: q₀ Final state: q₃


DFA Minimization Process:

Step 1: Initial Partition (P₀) Separate final states from non-final states. P₀ = {{q₃}, {q₀, q₁, q₂, q₄, q₅, q₆, q₇}}

Step 2: First Refinement (P₁) Let F = {q₃} and NF = {q₀, q₁, q₂, q₄, q₅, q₆, q₇}. We examine transitions for states in NF based on which partition their next states fall into (F or NF).

  • q₀: δ(q₀, 0) = q₁ ∈ NF, δ(q₀, 1) = q₀ ∈ NF
  • q₁: δ(q₁, 0) = q₀ ∈ NF, δ(q₁, 1) = q₂ ∈ NF
  • q₂: δ(q₂, 0) = q₃ ∈ F, δ(q₂, 1) = q₁ ∈ NF
  • q₄: δ(q₄, 0) = q₃ ∈ F, δ(q₄, 1) = q₅ ∈ NF
  • q₅: δ(q₅, 0) = q₆ ∈ NF, δ(q₅, 1) = q₄ ∈ NF
  • q₆: δ(q₆, 0) = q₅ ∈ NF, δ(q₆, 1) = q₆ ∈ NF
  • q₇: δ(q₇, 0) = q₆ ∈ NF, δ(q₇, 1) = q₃ ∈ F

Based on the above, the set NF splits:

  • States that transition to F for input 0: {q₂, q₄}
  • States that transition to F for input 1: {q₇}
  • States that transition only to NF for both inputs: {q₀, q₁, q₅, q₆}

So, P₁ = {{q₃}, {q₂, q₄}, {q₇}, {q₀, q₁, q₅, q₆}}

Step 3: Second Refinement (P₂) Let the partitions in P₁ be: P₁_1 = {q₃} P₁_2 = {q₂, q₄} P₁_3 = {q₇} P₁_4 = {q₀, q₁, q₅, q₆}

  • Check P₁_2 = {q₂, q₄}:

    • δ(q₂, 0) = q₃ ∈ P₁_1, δ(q₄, 0) = q₃ ∈ P₁_1
    • δ(q₂, 1) = q₁ ∈ P₁_4, δ(q₄, 1) = q₅ ∈ P₁_4 Since q₃ and q₃ are in the same partition (P₁_1), and q₁ and q₅ are in the same partition (P₁_4), q₂ and q₄ are not distinguishable. This partition remains {q₂, q₄}.
  • Check P₁_3 = {q₇}: This is a single state, so it remains {q₇}.

  • Check P₁_4 = {q₀, q₁, q₅, q₆}:

    • q₀: δ(q₀, 0) = q₁ ∈ P₁_4, δ(q₀, 1) = q₀ ∈ P₁_4
    • q₁: δ(q₁, 0) = q₀ ∈ P₁_4, δ(q₁, 1) = q₂ ∈ P₁_2 (Note: q₂ is in P₁_2, not P₁_4)
    • q₅: δ(q₅, 0) = q₆ ∈ P₁_4, δ(q₅, 1) = q₄ ∈ P₁_2 (Note: q₄ is in P₁_2, not P₁_4)
    • q₆: δ(q₆, 0) = q₅ ∈ P₁_4, δ(q₆, 1) = q₆ ∈ P₁_4

    Based on transitions for input 1:

    • States whose δ(s, 1) goes to P₁_2: {q₁, q₅}
    • States whose δ(s, 1) goes to P₁_4: {q₀, q₆} Thus, P₁_4 splits into {{q₁, q₅}, {q₀, q₆}}.

So, P₂ = {{q₃}, {q₂, q₄}, {q₇}, {q₁, q₅}, {q₀, q₆}}

Step 4: Third Refinement (P₃) Let the partitions in P₂ be: P₂_1 = {q₃} P₂_2 = {q₂, q₄} P₂_3 = {q₇} P₂_4 = {q₁, q₅} P₂_5 = {q₀, q₆}

  • Check P₂_2 = {q₂, q₄}:

    • δ(q₂, 0) = q₃ ∈ P₂_1, δ(q₄, 0) = q₃ ∈ P₂_1
    • δ(q₂, 1) = q₁ ∈ P₂_4, δ(q₄, 1) = q₅ ∈ P₂_4 No split.
  • Check P₂_4 = {q₁, q₅}:

    • δ(q₁, 0) = q₀ ∈ P₂_5, δ(q₅, 0) = q₆ ∈ P₂_5
    • δ(q₁, 1) = q₂ ∈ P₂_2, δ(q₅, 1) = q₄ ∈ P₂_2 No split.
  • Check P₂_5 = {q₀, q₆}:

    • δ(q₀, 0) = q₁ ∈ P₂_4, δ(q₆, 0) = q₅ ∈ P₂_4
    • δ(q₀, 1) = q₀ ∈ P₂_5, δ(q₆, 1) = q₆ ∈ P₂_5 No split.

Since P₃ = P₂, the algorithm terminates.


Final Minimized DFA:

We assign new names to the equivalent classes:

  • A = {q₀, q₆} (Initial State, as q₀ is the original initial state)
  • B = {q₁, q₅}
  • C = {q₂, q₄}
  • D = {q₃} (Final State, as q₃ is the original final state)
  • E = {q₇}

Minimized DFA Transition Table:

State/input01
->ABA
BAC
CDB
D*DA
EAD

Solution:

The final minimized DFA is represented by the following transition table:

State/input01
->ABA
BAC
CDB
D*DA
EAD

Where:

  • Initial state is A.
  • Final state is D.
  • The new states correspond to the following sets of original states:
    • A = {q₀, q₆}
    • B = {q₁, q₅}
    • C = {q₂, q₄}
    • D = {q₃}
    • E = {q₇}

Explanation of the solution:

  1. Initial Partition: Group states into final and non-final sets (P₀).
  2. Iterative Refinement: For each partition, check if any two states within it are distinguishable. States p and q are distinguishable if for some input a, δ(p, a) and δ(q, a) fall into different partitions of the previous step.
  3. Splitting: If states are distinguishable, split the partition into smaller ones.
  4. Termination: Repeat until no more partitions can be split (Pᵢ = Pᵢ₊₁).
  5. Construct Minimized DFA: Each final partition forms a new state in the minimized DFA. The initial and final states are determined by which new states contain the original initial and final states.