Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Derive the formula \( \omega = \dfrac{{D\lambda }}{d} \) for fringe width in Young's double-slit exp...

Derive the formula ω=Dλd\omega = \dfrac{{D\lambda }}{d} for fringe width in Young's double-slit experiment. The symbols used have their usual meanings.

Explanation

Solution

Hint
In Young's double-slit experiment, we have two slits separated by a distance. Two coherent sources will produce an interference pattern. This will create alternate bright and dark fringes. The separation between the two consecutive bright fringes is called the fringe width.

Complete step by step answer

As shown in the figure, there will be two rays of light from the two slits A and B. The rays will have a path difference. The path difference can be written as,
dsinθ=nλ\Rightarrow d\sin \theta = n\lambda ………………………………………………..equation
Where θ\theta is the angle between the incident ray and the normal. dd is the distance between the slits, nn is an integer that stands for the order of the fringes, and λ\lambda is the wavelength of the light.
We know that, for small angles sinθθ\sin \theta \approx \theta
Then we can write equation as,
dθ=nλ\Rightarrow d\theta = n\lambda
From this we get θ=nλd\theta = \dfrac{{n\lambda }}{d}
Let the screen be placed at a distance DD and let yy be the position of maxima
yD=tanθ\Rightarrow \dfrac{y}{D} = \tan \theta
For small angle tanθθ\tan \theta \approx \theta
Hence we can write the above equation as
θ=yD\Rightarrow \theta = \dfrac{y}{D}
From this equation we get,
y=Dθ\Rightarrow y = D\theta
Substituting the expression for θ\theta from equation, we get,
y=nλDd\Rightarrow y = \dfrac{{n\lambda D}}{d}
The fringe width can be written as the difference between two maxima,
For an nth{n^{th}} order fringe, Yn=nλDd{Y_n} = \dfrac{{n\lambda D}}{d}
And the (n+1)th{\left( {n + 1} \right)^{th}} order fringe, Yn+1=(n+1)λDd{Y_{n + 1}} = \dfrac{{(n + 1)\lambda D}}{d}
Let ω\omega be the separation between two consecutive bright or dark fringe then
The fringe width can be written as,
ω=(n+1)λDdnλDd\Rightarrow \omega = \dfrac{{\left( {n + 1} \right)\lambda D}}{d} - \dfrac{{n\lambda D}}{d}
λDd(n+1n)\Rightarrow \dfrac{{\lambda D}}{d}\left( {n + 1 - n} \right)
Therefore we get,
ω=Dλd\Rightarrow \omega = \dfrac{{D\lambda }}{d}

Note
The width of the fringes is inversely proportional to the separation between the slits, i.e. when the separation between the slits (d)\left( d \right) increases, the fringe width will decrease. The separation between the slits and the screen is directly proportional to the fringe width i.e. when the separation between the slits and the screen (D)\left( D \right) increases the fringe width increases.