Question
Question: Consider the function $f(x) = \begin{cases} x + x^2 \cos(\frac{\pi}{x}), x \neq 0 \\ 0 , x = 0 \end...
Consider the function
f(x)={x+x2cos(xπ),x=00,x=0
consider the following statements. Then which of the following is/are correct?

f′(0) exists and is equal to 1
f is not increasing in the viscinity of 0
f′(0) doesn't exist
f is increasing on R
A, B
Solution
To analyze the given function f(x) and the statements, we will evaluate the derivative at x=0 and examine the behavior of f′(x) in the vicinity of x=0.
The function is defined as: f(x)={x+x2cos(xπ),0,x=0x=0
Part 1: Evaluate f′(0)
We use the definition of the derivative at a point: f′(0)=limh→0hf(0+h)−f(0)
Substitute the function definition: f′(0)=limh→0h(h+h2cos(hπ))−0 f′(0)=limh→0hh(1+hcos(hπ))
For h=0, we can cancel h: f′(0)=limh→0(1+hcos(hπ))
We know that −1≤cos(hπ)≤1. Multiplying by h (assuming h>0, if h<0 then the inequalities reverse but the absolute value bound remains): −∣h∣≤hcos(hπ)≤∣h∣
As h→0, by the Squeeze Theorem, hcos(hπ)→0. Therefore, f′(0)=1+0=1.
Statement A: f′(0) exists and is equal to 1.
Based on our calculation, this statement is correct.
Statement C: f′(0) doesn't exist.
Since we found f′(0)=1, this statement is incorrect.
Part 2: Analyze the increasing/decreasing nature of f(x) in the vicinity of 0
For f(x) to be increasing in the vicinity of 0, there must exist an open interval (−δ,δ) for some δ>0 such that f(x) is increasing on this interval. For a differentiable function, this implies that f′(x)≥0 for all x∈(−δ,δ).
First, let's find f′(x) for x=0: f′(x)=dxd(x+x2cos(xπ))
Using the product rule and chain rule: f′(x)=1+(2xcos(xπ)+x2(−sin(xπ))(−x2π)) f′(x)=1+2xcos(xπ)+πsin(xπ)
Now, let's check the sign of f′(x) as x→0. The term 2xcos(xπ) approaches 0 as x→0 (by Squeeze Theorem, similar to hcos(hπ)). However, the term πsin(xπ) oscillates between −π and π as x→0.
Consider a sequence of points xk approaching 0 from the positive side, such that sin(xkπ) takes a specific value. Let xkπ=23π+2kπ for large positive integer k. This implies xk1=23+2k=23+4k, so xk=3+4k2. As k→∞, xk→0+. At these points, sin(xkπ)=sin(23π+2kπ)=sin(23π)=−1. And cos(xkπ)=cos(23π+2kπ)=cos(23π)=0.
Substitute these into f′(x): f′(xk)=1+2xkcos(xkπ)+πsin(xkπ) f′(xk)=1+2(3+4k2)(0)+π(−1) f′(xk)=1−π
Since π≈3.14159, 1−π≈1−3.14159=−2.14159, which is a negative value. This means that for any arbitrarily small positive δ, we can find a point xk=3+4k2 (by choosing k large enough such that xk<δ) in the interval (0,δ) where f′(xk)<0. Since f′(x) takes negative values in any neighborhood of 0, the function f(x) cannot be increasing in the vicinity of 0.
Statement B: f is not increasing in the vicinity of 0.
Based on our analysis, this statement is correct.
Statement D: f is increasing on R.
Since f(x) is not increasing in the vicinity of 0, it cannot be increasing on the entire real line R. This statement is incorrect.
Conclusion:
Statements A and B are correct.
The final answer is A,B
Explanation of the solution:
- Calculate f′(0): Use the definition of the derivative f′(0)=limh→0hf(h)−f(0). Substitute f(h)=h+h2cos(hπ) and f(0)=0. This simplifies to limh→0(1+hcos(hπ)). By the Squeeze Theorem, hcos(hπ)→0 as h→0. Thus, f′(0)=1. This confirms statement A and refutes statement C.
- Determine if f is increasing near 0: Calculate f′(x) for x=0: f′(x)=1+2xcos(xπ)+πsin(xπ). For f to be increasing in the vicinity of 0, f′(x) must be non-negative in some interval around 0. Consider points xk=3+4k2 as k→∞. These points approach 0. At these points, sin(xkπ)=−1 and cos(xkπ)=0. Substituting these into f′(x), we get f′(xk)=1−π. Since 1−π<0, f′(x) takes negative values arbitrarily close to 0. Therefore, f(x) is not increasing in the vicinity of 0. This confirms statement B and refutes statement D.