Question
Logical Reasoning Question on Statements and Assumptions
Consider the following principle : In a dispute between X and Y, Y can sue X :
(i) In the city of Y’s residence, OR
(ii) In the city of X’s residence, OR
(iii) In the city where the dispute arose
Y lives in Calcutta and is the owner of the restaurant ‘Y’s Yummilicious Restaurant’, located in Calcutta. X lives in Delhi and starts a restaurant named ‘Yummilicious Restaurant’ in Delhi. Y wants to sue X for infringement of the name ‘Yummilicious Restaurant’.
Y can sue X :
In Delhi only
In Calcutta, but only if the dispute arose in Calcutta
In either one of Delhi and Calcutta, regardless of where the dispute arose
None of the above
In either one of Delhi and Calcutta, regardless of where the dispute arose
Solution
The correct option is (C): In either one of Delhi and Calcutta, regardless of where the dispute arose