Question
Question: Can there be A.P. which consists of only prime numbers?...
Can there be A.P. which consists of only prime numbers?
Solution
We know that prime numbers are those numbers which are divisible by only 1 and the number itself. So, first assume a general A.P of n terms (i.e. a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6............,an), which consists of only prime number and then find (a1+1)th term of the A.P. and try to contradict your above assumption.
Complete step by step answer:
Let us first assume a general A.P., which consists of n terms and also assume that all of them are prime.
Let the A.P. be a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6............,an and the common difference of the A.P. be ‘d’.
Since, the rth term of the above A.P. will be given by:
Tr=a1+(r−1)d
Now, we will find (a1+1)th term of the above assumed A.P.
So, Tan+1=a1+(a1+1−1)d
⇒Tan+1=a1+(a1+1−1)d
⇒Tan+1=a1+a1d
Now, take a1 common from both of the terms:
⇒Ta1+1=a1(1+d)
Here, (1+d)will always be greater than 2 as the common difference of the prime number is always greater than 1 and also ‘d’ can never be zero.
So, the (a1+1)th of the A.P. (a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6............,an) is a1(1+d).
So, a1(1+d) must be a prime number, and we know that prime numbers are divisible by only 1 and the number itself.
But, we can see that a1(1+d) is the multiple of two number (i.e. a1 and (1+d)), and also (1+d) is always greater than or equal to 1.
Hence, we can say that (a1+1)th term of the A.P. which consists of only prime number is divisible by a1 and (1+d).
Hence, (a1+1)th is not a prime number.
So, this contradicts our above assumption.
Hence, it is never possible to have an A.P. which consists of only prime number.
Note: Students are required to note that if they assume any A.P which consists of prime numbers then the common difference of that A.P. will always be greater than 1 because prime number is always a whole number. And, to contradict your own assumption students are required to find such a term A.P. which is possible to convert into multiple of two or more numbers.