Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Calculate the weight of \({{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}\) produced from 2 g of \(VO\) and 5.75g of \(F{{e}_{2}}...

Calculate the weight of V2O5{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}} produced from 2 g of VOVO and 5.75g of Fe2O3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}.
VO+Fe2O3FeO+V2O5VO+F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\to FeO+{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}

Explanation

Solution

It is limiting reagent based numerical and in this first we have to find out the limiting reagent from the given reaction and the data according to stoichiometric calculations and then from this limiting reagent we can find the amount of product formed which is dependent on the limiting reagent. Now solve it.

Complete Solution :
This numerical is based on the concept of the limiting reagent. Many times, the reactions are carried out when the reactants are not present in the amounts as required by the balanced chemical reaction.
In such situations, one reactant is in excess over the other and the other reactant which is present in a lesser amount gets consumed and after that no reaction occurs and thus, it limits the amount of product formed and is, therefore, known as the limiting reagent.

- Now considering the statement :
The reaction is given as:
VO+Fe2O3FeO+V2O5VO+F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\to FeO+{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}

- After balancing we get, the reaction as:
2VO+3Fe2O36FeO+V2O52VO+3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\to 6FeO+{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}} ---------------(1)

- Now, first of all we will find the limiting reagent on whose product form depends.
So, the molecular mass of VO=51+16=67g mole1VO = 51 + 16 = 67g\text{ }mol{{e}^{-1}}
Since, the balanced reaction involves two moles of VOVO, then
Molecular mass of 2 moles of VO=67×2=134gVO = 67\times 2 = 134 g
Similarly, the molecular mass of Fe2O3=56×2+16×3=112+48=160g mole1F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} = 56\times 2+16\times 3 = 112 + 48 = 160g\text{ }mol{{e}^{-1}}

Since, the balanced reaction involves three moles of Fe2O3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}, then
Molecular mass of 3 moles of Fe2O3=160×3=480gF{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} = 160\times 3 = 480g
Molecular mass of V2O5=51×2+16×5=102+80=182g mole1{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}=51\times 2 + 16\times 5 = 102 + 80 = 182g\text{ }mol{{e}^{-1}}
Now from equation (1) , According to the stoichiometric calculations; we will find the limiting reagent as:
134g of VO requires=480g of Fe2O3 1g of VO requires=480134g of Fe2O3  2g of VO requires=480134×2g of Fe2O3   =7.16 g of Fe2O3  \begin{aligned} & 134g\text{ }of\text{ }VO\text{ }requires = 480g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} \\\ & \,1g\text{ }of\text{ }VO\text{ }requires=\dfrac{480}{134}g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} \\\ & \text{ 2}g\text{ }of\text{ }VO\text{ }requires = \dfrac{480}{134}\times 2g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\text{ } \\\ & \text{ =7}\text{.16 }g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\text{ } \\\ \end{aligned}
But we have been given 5.75 g of Fe2O3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} in the statement.

- So, it means that Fe2O3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} is the limiting factor and the amount of product depends upon it.
From equation (1), according to stoichiometric calculations; the amount of product formed is;
480g of Fe2O3 requires=182g of V2O5 1g of Fe2O3 requires =182480g of V2O5 5.75g of Fe2O3requires=182480×5.75g of V2O5   =2.18 g of V2O5  \begin{aligned} & \text{480g }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\text{ }requires = 182g\text{ }of\text{ }{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}} \\\ & \,1g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}\text{ }requires\text{ }=\dfrac{182}{480}g\text{ }of\text{ }{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}} \\\ & \text{5}\text{.75}g\text{ }of\text{ }F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}}requires=\dfrac{182}{480}\times 5.75g\text{ }of\text{ }{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}\text{ } \\\ & \text{ =2}\text{.18 }g\text{ }of\text{ }{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}}\text{ } \\\ \end{aligned}
Therefore, the weight of V2O5{{V}_{2}}{{O}_{5}} produced from 2 g of VOVO and 5.75g of Fe2O3F{{e}_{2}}{{O}_{3}} is 2.18 g.

Note: Always keep in mind that the reactions which involve the limiting factor i.e. the reagent which is fully consumed then in those reactions the weight of the product that is formed depends upon that limiting factor and not on the other reactant which is present in excess.