Question
Question: Find the final DFA by performing the DFA minimization process. A is initial state and final states a...
Find the final DFA by performing the DFA minimization process. A is initial state and final states are B, C, D, E, F, G.

The final minimized DFA is given by the transition table in the solution.
Solution
To perform DFA minimization, we will use the table-filling algorithm (also known as the Myhill-Nerode theorem based approach).
1. Complete the DFA:
The given DFA has undefined transitions: δ(A, 1)
and δ(F, 1)
. To make the DFA complete, we introduce a new non-final trap state, T
. All undefined transitions will go to T
, and from T
, all transitions will loop back to T
.
- Original states: Q = {A, B, C, D, E, F, G}
- Initial state: A
- Final states: F_orig = {B, C, D, E, F, G}
- Non-final states: NF_orig = {A}
- New set of states: Q' = Q ∪ {T} = {A, B, C, D, E, F, G, T}
- New Final States: F_new = F_orig = {B, C, D, E, F, G}
- New Non-Final States: NF_new = NF_orig ∪ {T} = {A, T}
The complete transition table is:
Q/Σ | 0 | 1 |
---|---|---|
A | B | T |
B | C | C |
C | D | E |
D | C | C |
E | B | G |
F | E | T |
G | B | G |
T | T | T |
2. Initial Partition (P₀):
Separate final states from non-final states.
P₀ = { {A, T}, {B, C, D, E, F, G} }
Let P₀_NF = {A, T}
and P₀_F = {B, C, D, E, F, G}
.
3. First Refinement (P₁):
-
For
P₀_NF = {A, T}
:δ(A, 0) = B ∈ P₀_F
δ(A, 1) = T ∈ P₀_NF
δ(T, 0) = T ∈ P₀_NF
δ(T, 1) = T ∈ P₀_NF
A
andT
are distinguishable becauseδ(A, 0)
leads to a state inP₀_F
whileδ(T, 0)
leads to a state inP₀_NF
. So,P₀_NF
splits into{A}
and{T}
. -
For
P₀_F = {B, C, D, E, F, G}
:We check which states transition to
P₀_NF
for any input.F
:δ(F, 1) = T ∈ P₀_NF
.
All other states in
P₀_F
(B, C, D, E, G) transition only to states withinP₀_F
for both inputs. So,P₀_F
splits into{F}
and{B, C, D, E, G}
.
Thus, P₁ = { {A}, {T}, {F}, {B, C, D, E, G} }
Let P₁_1 = {A}
, P₁_2 = {T}
, P₁_3 = {F}
, P₁_4 = {B, C, D, E, G}
.
4. Second Refinement (P₂):
-
P₁_1
,P₁_2
,P₁_3
are singletons, so they cannot be split further. -
For
P₁_4 = {B, C, D, E, G}
:We check pairs of states within this partition based on which partition in
P₁
their next states fall into.-
Compare
B
andD
:δ(B, 0) = C ∈ P₁_4
,δ(D, 0) = C ∈ P₁_4
δ(B, 1) = C ∈ P₁_4
,δ(D, 1) = C ∈ P₁_4
Since
B
andD
transition to states in the same partitions for both inputs, they are equivalent. Group:{B, D}
. -
Compare
E
andG
:δ(E, 0) = B ∈ P₁_4
,δ(G, 0) = B ∈ P₁_4
δ(E, 1) = G ∈ P₁_4
,δ(G, 1) = G ∈ P₁_4
Since
E
andG
transition to states in the same partitions for both inputs, they are equivalent. Group:{E, G}
. -
State
C
is left alone for now.
Now, check if
{B, D}
,{E, G}
, and{C}
are distinguishable from each other considering their transitions to these new sub-partitions.B,D
:δ({B,D}, 0) = C ∈ {C}
,δ({B,D}, 1) = C ∈ {C}
C
:δ(C, 0) = D ∈ {B,D}
,δ(C, 1) = E ∈ {E,G}
E,G
:δ({E,G}, 0) = B ∈ {B,D}
,δ({E,G}, 1) = G ∈ {E,G}
All these groups are distinguishable. For example,
δ({B,D},0)
goes to{C}
, butδ(C,0)
goes to{B,D}
. -
Thus, P₁_4
splits into {B, D}
, {E, G}
, and {C}
.
So, P₂ = { {A}, {T}, {F}, {B, D}, {E, G}, {C} }
5. Third Refinement (P₃):
Let the partitions in P₂
be:
P₂_1 = {A}
P₂_2 = {T}
P₂_3 = {F}
P₂_4 = {B, D}
P₂_5 = {E, G}
P₂_6 = {C}
-
All single-state partitions (
{A}
,{T}
,{F}
,{C}
) cannot be split further. -
For
P₂_4 = {B, D}
:δ(B, 0) = C ∈ P₂_6
,δ(D, 0) = C ∈ P₂_6
δ(B, 1) = C ∈ P₂_6
,δ(D, 1) = C ∈ P₂_6
Since
B
andD
transition to states in the same partitions (P₂_6
) for both inputs,{B, D}
remains a single partition. -
For
P₂_5 = {E, G}
:δ(E, 0) = B ∈ P₂_4
,δ(G, 0) = B ∈ P₂_4
δ(E, 1) = G ∈ P₂_5
,δ(G, 1) = G ∈ P₂_5
Since
E
andG
transition to states in the same partitions (P₂_4
andP₂_5
respectively) for both inputs,{E, G}
remains a single partition.
Since P₃ = P₂
, the algorithm terminates.
6. Construct the Minimized DFA:
Assign new names to the equivalent classes:
S_A
= {A} (Initial State, Non-Final)S_T
= {T} (Non-Final)S_F
= {F} (Final State)S_BD
= {B, D} (Final State)S_EG
= {E, G} (Final State)S_C
= {C} (Final State)
The initial state of the minimized DFA is S_A
(since A is the original initial state).
The final states of the minimized DFA are S_F
, S_BD
, S_EG
, S_C
(since F, B, D, E, G, C are original final states).
Minimized DFA Transition Table:
State/input | 0 | 1 |
---|---|---|
->S_A | S_BD | S_T |
S_T | S_T | S_T |
S_F* | S_EG | S_T |
S_BD* | S_C | S_C |
S_EG* | S_BD | S_EG |
S_C* | S_BD | S_EG |
Where *
denotes a final state.
The final DFA is represented by the transition table above.
Explanation of the solution:
- Completion: The initial DFA had undefined transitions, which were handled by adding a trap state
T
(non-final). - Initial Partition: States were grouped into non-final (
{A, T}
) and final ({B, C, D, E, F, G}
). - Iterative Refinement: Partitions were iteratively split by identifying distinguishable states. States
p
andq
are distinguishable if their transitions on some inputa
lead to states in different partitions from the previous step.- In
P₀
,A
andT
were separated.F
was separated from other final states because its1
-transition went to the non-final trap state. - In
P₁
, within{B, C, D, E, G}
,B
andD
were found to be equivalent, andE
andG
were found to be equivalent, leading to further splits.
- In
- Termination: The process stopped when no more partitions could be split.
- Final DFA Construction: Each resulting partition forms a new state in the minimized DFA. The initial state is the partition containing the original initial state, and final states are partitions containing any original final states.
Answer:
The final minimized DFA is given by the following transition table:
State/input | 0 | 1 |
---|---|---|
->S_A | S_BD | S_T |
S_T | S_T | S_T |
S_F* | S_EG | S_T |
S_BD* | S_C | S_C |
S_EG* | S_BD | S_EG |
S_C* | S_BD | S_EG |
Where:
S_A
represents the original state{A}
(initial, non-final)S_T
represents the trap state{T}
(non-final)S_F
represents the original state{F}
(final)S_BD
represents the equivalent states{B, D}
(final)S_EG
represents the equivalent states{E, G}
(final)S_C
represents the original state{C}
(final)