Question
Question: Assertion(A): All trigonometric functions have their inverses over the respective principal domain. ...
Assertion(A): All trigonometric functions have their inverses over the respective principal domain.
Reason(R): The inverse of cos−1 x: [-1,1]→ [0, π] exists.

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is false but R is true
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
Solution
Explanation of the solution:
-
Analyze Assertion (A): "All trigonometric functions have their inverses over the respective principal domain."
- Trigonometric functions (sin, cos, tan, etc.) are periodic and thus not one-to-one over their natural domains.
- To define their inverse functions, their domains are restricted to specific intervals (principal domains) where they become one-to-one and onto their ranges.
- For example, sinx restricted to [−π/2,π/2] is one-to-one and onto [−1,1], allowing sin−1x to be defined from [−1,1] to [−π/2,π/2]. Similar restrictions apply to all other trigonometric functions.
- Therefore, Assertion (A) is True.
-
Analyze Reason (R): "The inverse of cos−1 x: [-1,1]→ [0, π] exists."
- Let f(x)=cos−1x. This function is defined with a domain of [−1,1] and a range of [0,π].
- By definition, cos−1x is the inverse of the cosine function when the cosine function's domain is restricted to [0,π]. This means cos−1x is a bijection from [−1,1] to [0,π].
- Any function that is a bijection (one-to-one and onto) has an inverse.
- The inverse of f(x)=cos−1x is f−1(y)=cosy, with domain [0,π] and range [−1,1].
- Therefore, Reason (R) is True.
-
Evaluate if R is the correct explanation of A:
- Assertion (A) makes a general statement about all trigonometric functions and the necessity of principal domains for their inverses to exist.
- Reason (R) states a specific fact about the existence of the inverse of cos−1x. The existence of the inverse of cos−1x (which is cosx restricted to its principal domain) does not explain why the original trigonometric functions need domain restrictions to have inverses. It's a consequence of the definition of inverse trigonometric functions, not an explanation for the general principle.
- Thus, R is not the correct explanation for A.
Conclusion: Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation for Assertion (A).