Question
Question: An alloy of lead (valency\( = 2\))-thallium (valency\( = 1\)) containing \(70\% \) Pb and \(30\% \) ...
An alloy of lead (valency=2)-thallium (valency=1) containing 70% Pb and 30% Tl, can be electroplated onto a cathode from a perchloric acid solution. How many hours would be required to deposit 5.0 g of this alloy at a current of 1.10 A ? (Pb=208, Tl=204)
Solution
First of all we will find out the amount of particular metal being deposited. Then we will find the number of equivalents. After that by using Faraday’s Law we will eventually find out the time required for deposition of the alloy.
Complete step by step answer:
In the given question it is mentioned that the alloy of Lead (Pb)-Thallium (Tl) contain 70% Pb and 30% Tl. We have to find out the time required to deposit a total of 5.0 g of this alloy when 1.10 A current flows through it.Firstly, we have to separately find the amount of particular metal being electroplated.
Amount of Lead (Pb) electroplated =5×10070=3.5 g
Then, Amount of Thallium (Tl) electroplated=5×10030=1.5 g
Secondly, we have to find the number of equivalents of metal.
Number of equivalent = equivalent weightweight of the metal (in grams)
Equivalent weight=ValencyMolecular weight
Thus, Number of equivalent of Pb
Number of equivalent of Pb=equivalent weightweight of Pb (in grams) ⇒ Number of equivalent of Pb=22083.5 ⇒ Number of equivalent of Pb=1043.5 ⇒ Number of equivalent of Pb=0.0336
Now, we have to find the number of equivalent of Tl
Number of equivalent of Tl=equivalent weightweight of Tl (in grams) ⇒Number of equivalent of Tl=12041.5 ⇒Number of equivalent of Tl=2041.5 ⇒Number of equivalent of Tl=0.0073
Thirdly, from Faraday’s law we can find out the time required for the electroplating,
Total number of equivalents=number of faradays
⇒0.0336+0.0073=96500I×t ⇒0.0409=965001.1×t ⇒1.10.0409×96500=t ⇒3588.04 s=t ∴t=59.80 min
Thus, we have found out that 59.80 min is required to deposit 5 g of Pb-Tl alloy by passing 1.10 A of current.
Note: From Faraday’s Law of Electrolysis we have to use a number of Faradays in order to solve the respective solution. There is a possibility to skip equivalent weight of metal which is the prime key to solve the problem. The equivalent weight should be found in terms of molecular weight and valency as done in the question.