Question
Question: A particle of mass $m$ moves on the x-axis as follows: It starts from rest at $t=0$ from the point $...
A particle of mass m moves on the x-axis as follows: It starts from rest at t=0 from the point x=0, and comes to rest at t=1 at the point x=1. No other information is available about its motion at intermediate times (0<t<1). If a denotes the instantaneous acceleration of the particle, then:

a cannot remain positive for all t in the interval $0 \leq t \leq 1
∣a∣ cannot exceed 2 at any point in its path
∣a∣ must be ≥4 at some point of points in its path
a must change sign during the motion, but no other assertion can be made with the information given
Options A and C are correct.
Solution
Let x(t), v(t), and a(t) be the position, velocity, and acceleration of the particle at time t.
We are given the following conditions:
- x(0)=0
- v(0)=0 (starts from rest)
- x(1)=1
- v(1)=0 (comes to rest)
The motion is in the interval 0≤t≤1.
First, let's consider the average velocity:
vˉ=1−0x(1)−x(0)=11−0=1.
By the Mean Value Theorem for derivatives, there exists t0∈(0,1) such that v(t0)=vˉ=1.
Now consider the velocity function v(t). We have v(0)=0, v(1)=0, and v(t0)=1 for some t0∈(0,1).
Since v(0)=0 and v(t0)=1, the velocity increases from 0 to 1 in the interval [0,t0].
Since v(t0)=1 and v(1)=0, the velocity decreases from 1 to 0 in the interval [t0,1].
Consider Option A: a cannot remain positive for all t in the interval 0≤t≤1.
If a(t)>0 for all t∈[0,1], then v(t)=v(0)+∫0ta(τ)dτ=∫0ta(τ)dτ. Since a(τ)>0 for τ>0, v(t)>0 for t∈(0,1]. This contradicts v(1)=0.
If a(t)≥0 for all t∈[0,1], then v(t) is non-decreasing. Since v(0)=0, v(t)≥0 for all t∈[0,1]. If a(t) is not identically zero on [0,1], then v(t) would be strictly increasing over some interval, leading to v(1)>0. If a(t)=0 for all t, then v(t)=0 for all t, which means x(t)=x(0)=0 for all t, contradicting x(1)=1. Thus, a(t) cannot be ≥0 for all t∈[0,1]. Similarly, a(t) cannot be ≤0 for all t∈[0,1] (this would lead to v(t)≤0 and v(1)<0 unless a(t)=0 everywhere).
Therefore, a(t) must take both positive and negative values in the interval (0,1). This means a must change sign.
Option A is correct.
Consider Option D: a must change sign during the motion, but no other assertion can be made with the information given.
We have shown that a must change sign. However, we can make other assertions, as we will see by analyzing the magnitude of a. So, the second part of Option D is incorrect.
Consider the acceleration a(t)=v′(t).
By the Mean Value Theorem applied to v(t) on the interval [0,t0], there exists t1∈(0,t0) such that a(t1)=v′(t1)=t0−0v(t0)−v(0)=t01−0=t01.
Since t0∈(0,1), 0<t0<1, so a(t1)=t01>1.
By the Mean Value Theorem applied to v(t) on the interval [t0,1], there exists t2∈(t0,1) such that a(t2)=v′(t2)=1−t0v(1)−v(t0)=1−t00−1=1−t0−1.
Since t0∈(0,1), 0<1−t0<1, so a(t2)=1−t0−1<−1.
Thus, ∣a(t1)∣=t01 and ∣a(t2)∣=1−t01.
Since t0∈(0,1), we have t01>1 and 1−t01>1.
At least one of these values must be ≥2. If t01<2 and 1−t01<2, then t0>1/2 and 1−t0>1/2, so t0<1/2. This is a contradiction.
Thus, max(t01,1−t01)≥2.
So, there exists a point where ∣a∣≥2. This means Option B: ∣a∣ cannot exceed 2 at any point in its path, is incorrect.
Now consider the minimum value that max(∣a(t1)∣,∣a(t2)∣) can take. This minimum occurs when t01=1−t01, which implies t0=1/2. In this case, ∣a(t1)∣=2 and ∣a(t2)∣=2. So, there are points where ∣a∣≥2.
Let M=supt∈[0,1]∣a(t)∣. We have M≥∣a(t1)∣=1/t0 and M≥∣a(t2)∣=1/(1−t0).
So, M≥max(t01,1−t01). Since this holds for any t0 such that v(t0)=1, and we know such a t0 exists, M≥mint0∈(0,1)max(t01,1−t01). The minimum value is 2, occurring at t0=1/2.
So, the maximum magnitude of acceleration must be at least 2.
Let's try to get a stronger bound using integration.
We have v(t)=∫0ta(τ)dτ.
x(1)−x(0)=∫01v(t)dt=1.
Also, v(1)−v(0)=∫01a(t)dt=0.
Consider the integral ∫01ta(t)dt. Using integration by parts:
∫01ta(t)dt=∫01tv′(t)dt=[tv(t)]01−∫01v(t)dt=(1⋅v(1)−0⋅v(0))−∫01v(t)dt=(1⋅0−0⋅0)−1=−1.
So, ∫01ta(t)dt=−1.
Similarly, consider the integral ∫01(1−t)a(t)dt. Using integration by parts:
∫01(1−t)a(t)dt=∫01(1−t)v′(t)dt=[(1−t)v(t)]01−∫01(−1)v(t)dτ=(0⋅v(1)−1⋅v(0))+∫01v(t)dt=(0−0)+1=1.
So, ∫01(1−t)a(t)dt=1.
Let M=supt∈[0,1]∣a(t)∣.
From ∫01ta(t)dt=−1, we have ∣∫01ta(t)dt∣=1.
∣∫01ta(t)dt∣≤∫01∣ta(t)∣dt=∫01t∣a(t)∣dt≤∫01tMdt=M∫01tdt=M[2t2]01=M⋅21.
So, 1≤M/2, which implies M≥2.
From ∫01(1−t)a(t)dt=1, we have ∣∫01(1−t)a(t)dt∣=1.
∣∫01(1−t)a(t)dt∣≤∫01∣(1−t)a(t)∣dt=∫01(1−t)∣a(t)∣dt≤∫01(1−t)Mdt=M∫01(1−t)dt=M[t−2t2]01=M(1−21)=M⋅21.
So, 1≤M/2, which implies M≥2.
This method only guarantees M≥2.
Let's consider the integral ∫01(t−1/2)a(t)dt.
∫01(t−1/2)a(t)dt=∫01ta(t)dt−21∫01a(t)dt=−1−21(0)=−1.
So, ∣∫01(t−1/2)a(t)dt∣=1.
∣∫01(t−1/2)a(t)dt∣≤∫01∣t−1/2∣∣a(t)∣dt≤∫01∣t−1/2∣Mdt=M∫01∣t−1/2∣dt.
∫01∣t−1/2∣dt=∫01/2−(t−1/2)dt+∫1/21(t−1/2)dt=∫01/2(1/2−t)dt+∫1/21(t−1/2)dt
=[2t−2t2]01/2+[2t2−2t]1/21=(41−81)−(0−0)+(21−21)−(81−41)=81+(0)−(−81)=81+81=41.
So, 1≤M⋅41, which implies M≥4.
Thus, the maximum magnitude of acceleration ∣a∣ must be at least 4 at some point in the path.
This means ∣a∣ must be ≥4 at some point or points in its path.
Option C: ∣a∣ must be ≥4 at some point of points in its path, is correct.
Option B: ∣a∣ cannot exceed 2 at any point in its path. This is incorrect as M≥4.
Let's summarize:
Option A is correct because a must change sign.
Option B is incorrect because ∣a∣ must be at least 4 at some point.
Option C is correct because ∣a∣ must be at least 4 at some point.
Option D is incorrect because we can make other assertions (like ∣a∣≥4 at some point).
Since the question asks for the correct option(s), and this is a multiple choice question, we should check if multiple options can be correct. Based on our analysis, A and C are correct. However, in JEE/NEET, usually only one option is correct unless explicitly stated otherwise. Let's re-read the question and options carefully. The wording suggests that we need to choose one or more assertions that are true.
Let's consider if there's a possibility that only one option is intended to be correct. Option A states that a cannot remain positive for all t. This is true and implies a must change sign (or be zero everywhere, which is ruled out). Option C states that ∣a∣ must be ≥4 at some point. This is a stronger statement about the magnitude of a. Option D says a must change sign, but no other assertion can be made. This is false because we could assert ∣a∣≥4 at some point.
If this were a single-choice question, there might be an issue with the options provided, as both A and C seem correct. However, Option C provides a more specific and stronger conclusion about the motion, which is derived from the given conditions. Option A is a consequence of the velocity starting and ending at zero while displacement is non-zero. Option C is a consequence of the specific values of displacement and time interval.
If forced to choose a single option, Option C is a stronger statement than Option A.
Final Answer: The final answer is A,C