Question
Question: A particle of mass $\frac{10}{4}$ kg is moving in the positive x -direction. Its initial position is...
A particle of mass 410 kg is moving in the positive x -direction. Its initial position is x = 0 and initial velocity is 1 ms−1. Then velocity at x = 10 m is (in ms−1). The variation of power is shown in the graph

3 m/s
6 m/s
4 m/s
10 m/s
3 m/s
Solution
The problem asks us to find the final velocity of a particle given its mass, initial conditions, and a graph showing the variation of power with position.
-
Determine the equation for Power P as a function of position x from the graph:
The graph is a straight line passing through points (0,2) and (10,4).
The slope of the line is k=x2−x1P2−P1=10−04−2=102=51.
The P-intercept (value of P at x=0) is 2.
So, the equation of the line is P(x)=kx+c=51x+2. -
Relate Power to velocity and position:
Power P is defined as the rate of doing work, P=dtdW.
According to the Work-Energy Theorem, the work done on a particle is equal to the change in its kinetic energy, dW=dK.
So, P=dtdK.
Kinetic energy K=21mv2.
Therefore, P=dtd(21mv2)=21m⋅2vdtdv=mvdtdv.
To express power in terms of position x, we use the chain rule: dtdv=dxdvdtdx=vdxdv.
Substituting this into the power equation: P=mv(vdxdv)=mv2dxdv. -
Set up and solve the differential equation:
We have P(x)=51x+2.
So, 51x+2=mv2dxdv.
Rearranging for integration: (51x+2)dx=mv2dv.
Integrate both sides from the initial conditions to the final conditions:
Initial conditions: x0=0, v0=1 ms−1.
Final conditions: xf=10 m, vf=v.
∫010(51x+2)dx=∫1vmv2dv
Left-hand side integral:
∫010(51x+2)dx=[512x2+2x]010
=[10x2+2x]010
=(10102+2(10))−(1002+2(0))
=(10+20)−0=30.
Alternatively, the integral ∫Pdx represents the area under the P-x graph. The area is a trapezoid:
Area =21(sum of parallel sides)×height=21(P(0)+P(10))×(10−0)
Area =21(2+4)×10=21(6)×10=3×10=30.
Right-hand side integral:
Given mass m=410 kg=2.5 kg.
∫1vmv2dv=m[3v3]1v
=m(3v3−313)
=2.5(3v3−1).
- Equate the integrals and solve for v:
30=2.5(3v3−1)
30=25(3v3−1)
30=65(v3−1)
30×6=5(v3−1)
180=5(v3−1)
5180=v3−1
36=v3−1
v3=36+1
v3=37
Now, we need to find v=337.
Let's check the given options:
- 33=27
- 63=216
- 43=64
- 103=1000
None of the options exactly match v3=37. The value 337 is approximately 3.33.
There might be a numerical discrepancy in the problem statement or options provided. However, assuming the problem expects one of the options to be correct, and given that 37 is closest to 27 (for v=3) and 64 (for v=4), none of them are particularly close.
If we strictly follow the calculations, v=337 m/s. Since this is a multiple choice question, and none of the options are close, let's re-examine if there's any common mistake or if some value could be an approximation.
If the question intends for an integer answer, it implies that v3 should be a perfect cube.
Given the options, 3 m/s is the closest integer value. However, 33=27, not 37.
If the final velocity was meant to be 3 m/s, then v3−1=26.
Then 30=32.5(26)=365≈21.67. This is not 30.
Let's assume there is a typo in the mass value or initial velocity.
If v=3 m/s was the answer, then v3=27.
Then 30=3m(27−1)=326m.
m=2690=1345≈3.46 kg. This is not 2.5 kg.
If the question meant to give a perfect cube result, then v3 should be 27 or 64.
If v3=27, then v=3 m/s.
If v3=64, then v=4 m/s.
Let's re-check the graph values. P starts at 2 and ends at 4 for x from 0 to 10. This seems clear.
The mass is 10/4=2.5 kg. This is clear.
Initial velocity is 1 m/s. This is clear.
Given the options, it's possible the question expects us to choose the closest integer, but that's not standard practice without specific instructions.
However, in competitive exams, sometimes values are slightly off and the closest option is chosen.
3.333≈37.
33=27
43=64
37 is closer to 27 than 64. The distance ∣37−27∣=10, while ∣37−64∣=27.
So v=3 would be the "closest" integer option if an integer answer is expected.
Let's consider if the question meant P=mvdxdv instead of P=mv2dxdv.
No, P=Fv=mav=m(vdxdv)v=mv2dxdv is correct.
Given the options, and assuming there is no calculation error, there might be a slight numerical inaccuracy in the problem's design. If we must choose an option, v=3 is the closest integer value to 337.
Final check:
Mass m=2.5 kg.
Initial velocity v0=1 m/s.
Area under P-x graph from x=0 to x=10 is 30 J.
This area equals 3m(vf3−v03).
30=32.5(vf3−13)
90=2.5(vf3−1)
36=vf3−1
vf3=37.
The result vf=337 m/s is correct based on the problem statement. Since none of the options are 337, there is a mismatch. If I have to pick the closest one, 33=27 and 43=64. 37−27=10 and 64−37=27. So 3 is the closest integer for v.
Let's assume the question expects the answer to be 3 m/s and see what value of mass would lead to this.
30=3m(33−13)=3m(27−1)=326m.
m=2690=1345≈3.46 kg.
This is different from the given mass of 2.5 kg.
Let's assume the question expects the answer to be 4 m/s.
30=3m(43−13)=3m(64−1)=363m=21m.
m=2130=710≈1.43 kg.
This is also different from the given mass of 2.5 kg.
Since the calculation leads to v3=37, and this is not among the options, there is an error in the question's values or options. However, if forced to choose, the closest integer value of v such that v3 is near 37 is v=3.
Given the context of multiple-choice questions, sometimes they are designed such that the answer is one of the options, even if it requires a slight approximation or a rounding.
If we consider v≈3.33, then 3 is the closest integer answer among the choices.