Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: A metal surface is illuminated by light of two different wavelengths \(248\,nm\) and \(310\,nm\). Th...

A metal surface is illuminated by light of two different wavelengths 248nm248\,nm and 310nm310\,nm. The maximum speeds of the photoelectrons corresponding to these wavelengths are u1{u_1} and u2{u_2}, respectively. If the ratio u1:u2=2:1{u_1}:{u_2} = 2:1 and hc=1240eVnmhc = 1240eV\,nm, the work function of the metal is nearly:
(A) 3.7eV3.7eV
(B) 3.2eV3.2eV
(C) 2.8eV2.8eV
(D) 2.5eV2.5eV

Explanation

Solution

On the basis of Planck’s quantum theory, Albert Einstein found an equation which defines the photoelectric effect which is commonly known as Einstein photoelectric equation. By using this Einstein photoelectric equation, the work function of the metal is determined.

Useful formula
Einstein photoelectric equation,
K.E=hνϕ0K.E = h\nu - {\phi _0}
Where K.EK.E is the Kinetic energy, hh is the Planck constant, ν\nu is the frequency of radiation, ϕ0{\phi _0} is the work function

Complete step by step solution
By using Einstein photoelectric equation,
K.E=hνϕ0...................(1)K.E = h\nu - {\phi _0}\,...................\left( 1 \right)
Here K.EK.E is the kinetic energy, hνh\nu is the energy of photon, ϕ0{\phi _0} is the work function
As we know the Kinetic energy formula,
K.E=12×mv2K.E = \dfrac{1}{2} \times m{v^2}
Substitute the kinetic energy formula in equation (1),
12×mv2=hνϕ0...............(2)\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{v^2} = h\nu - {\phi _0}\,...............\left( 2 \right)
Where mm is the mass of the object, vv is the velocity of the object
The frequency of radiation,
ν=cλ\nu = \dfrac{c}{\lambda }
Substitute the threshold frequency value in the equation (2),
12×mv2=hcλϕ0...............(3)\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{v^2} = \dfrac{{hc}}{\lambda } - {\phi _0}\,...............\left( 3 \right)
The metal surface is illuminated by light of two different waves, then,
12×mv12=hcλ1ϕ0\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{v_1}^2 = \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0} and 12×mv22=hcλ2ϕ0\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{v_2}^2 = \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}
Hence the velocity is given as uu in the question, then the above equations are changed as,
12×mu12=hcλ1ϕ0\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{u_1}^2 = \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0} and 12×mu22=hcλ2ϕ0\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{u_2}^2 = \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}

By taking the ratio of two equations,
hcλ1ϕ0hcλ2ϕ0=12×mu1212×mu22\dfrac{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0}}}{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}}} = \dfrac{{\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{u_1}^2}}{{\dfrac{1}{2} \times m{u_2}^2}}
Cancelling the same term in RHS,
hcλ1ϕ0hcλ2ϕ0=u12u22\dfrac{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0}}}{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}}} = \dfrac{{{u_1}^2}}{{{u_2}^2}}
Taking the square as common in the above equation in RHS,
hcλ1ϕ0hcλ2ϕ0=(u1u2)2\dfrac{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0}}}{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}}} = {\left( {\dfrac{{{u_1}}}{{{u_2}}}} \right)^2}
Substituting the velocity ratio in the above equation in RHS,
hcλ1ϕ0hcλ2ϕ0=(21)2\dfrac{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0}}}{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}}} = {\left( {\dfrac{2}{1}} \right)^2}
By solving the above equation in RHS,
hcλ1ϕ0hcλ2ϕ0=4\dfrac{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0}}}{{\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}}} = 4
By rearranging the above equation,
hcλ1ϕ0=4(hcλ2ϕ0)\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0} = 4\left( {\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - {\phi _0}} \right)

By multiplying the values in RHS,
hcλ1ϕ0=4hcλ24ϕ0\dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}} - {\phi _0} = \dfrac{{4hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - 4{\phi _0}
Taking the work function value in one side and other values in other side,
4ϕ0ϕ0=4hcλ2hcλ14{\phi _0} - {\phi _0} = \dfrac{{4hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}}
By subtracting the work function in LHS,
3ϕ0=4hcλ2hcλ1....................(4)3{\phi _0} = \dfrac{{4hc}}{{{\lambda _2}}} - \dfrac{{hc}}{{{\lambda _1}}}\,....................\left( 4 \right)
Substituting the hchc, λ1{\lambda _1} and λ2{\lambda _2} in the equation (4),
3ϕ0=(4×1240310)12402483{\phi _0} = \left( {\dfrac{{4 \times 1240}}{{310}}} \right) - \dfrac{{1240}}{{248}}
By solving the above equation in RHS,
3ϕ0=165 3ϕ0=11  3{\phi _0} = 16 - 5 \\\ 3{\phi _0} = 11 \\\
By solving the above equation,
ϕ0=113 ϕ0=3.66eV ϕ03.7eV  {\phi _0} = \dfrac{{11}}{3} \\\ {\phi _0} = 3.66eV \\\ {\phi _0} \simeq 3.7eV \\\

Hence, the option (A) is correct.

Note: The incident photons from the source which collides with the electron inside an atom and emits the energy of the electron. A part of this energy is used by the electron to escape from the surface of the metal and the remaining part will be the kinetic energy with which the electron is ejected.