Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: A glass wedge of refractive index $\frac{3}{2}$ of inclination angle 0.01 radian is illuminated by m...

A glass wedge of refractive index 32\frac{3}{2} of inclination angle 0.01 radian is illuminated by monochromatic light of wavelength 6000 A˚\AA falling normally on it. If the 2nd2^{nd} bright fringe formed by the reflected light is observed at a distance of x x 10510^{-5} m from the edge of wedge, find x.

Answer

3

Explanation

Solution

The problem describes interference in a wedge-shaped thin film.

1. Identify the given parameters:

  • Refractive index of the glass wedge, μ=32\mu = \frac{3}{2}
  • Inclination angle of the wedge, θ=0.01\theta = 0.01 radian
  • Wavelength of monochromatic light, λ=6000A˚=6000×1010\lambda = 6000 \AA = 6000 \times 10^{-10} m = 6×1076 \times 10^{-7} m
  • We need to find the distance 'x' from the edge of the wedge for the 2nd2^{nd} bright fringe.

2. Understand phase change upon reflection: When light is incident normally on a thin film:

  • The first reflection occurs at the air-glass interface. Since light reflects from a denser medium, a phase change of π\pi (or an equivalent path change of λ/2\lambda/2) occurs.
  • The second reflection occurs at the glass-air interface. Since light reflects from a rarer medium, no phase change occurs.

Therefore, the net phase difference due to reflections between the two interfering rays is π\pi, which corresponds to an additional path difference of λ/2\lambda/2.

3. Determine the condition for a bright fringe: The path difference due to the film thickness 't' is 2μt2\mu t (for normal incidence).

Including the phase change due to reflection, the total effective path difference is ΔP=2μt+λ2\Delta P = 2\mu t + \frac{\lambda}{2}.

For constructive interference (bright fringe), the total effective path difference must be an integral multiple of the wavelength: ΔP=nλ\Delta P = n\lambda, where n=1,2,3,n = 1, 2, 3, \dots (order of the bright fringe).

So, 2μt+λ2=nλ2\mu t + \frac{\lambda}{2} = n\lambda

2μt=(n12)λ2\mu t = (n - \frac{1}{2})\lambda

For the 2nd2^{nd} bright fringe, n=2n=2:

2μt=(212)λ2\mu t = (2 - \frac{1}{2})\lambda

2μt=32λ2\mu t = \frac{3}{2}\lambda

4. Relate film thickness 't' to distance 'x' for a wedge:

For a small wedge angle θ\theta, the thickness 't' at a distance 'x' from the edge is given by:

t=xtanθt = x \tan\theta

Since θ=0.01\theta = 0.01 radian is a small angle, tanθθ\tan\theta \approx \theta.

So, t=xθt = x\theta.

5. Substitute and solve for 'x':

Substitute t=xθt = x\theta into the bright fringe condition:

2μ(xθ)=32λ2\mu (x\theta) = \frac{3}{2}\lambda

Now, plug in the given values:

2×(32)×x×(0.01)=32×(6×107 m)2 \times \left(\frac{3}{2}\right) \times x \times (0.01) = \frac{3}{2} \times (6 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m})

3×x×0.01=3×3×1073 \times x \times 0.01 = 3 \times 3 \times 10^{-7}

0.03x=9×1070.03x = 9 \times 10^{-7}

x=9×1070.03x = \frac{9 \times 10^{-7}}{0.03}

x=9×1073×102x = \frac{9 \times 10^{-7}}{3 \times 10^{-2}}

x=3×107(2)x = 3 \times 10^{-7 - (-2)}

x=3×105x = 3 \times 10^{-5} m

The question asks for 'x' such that the distance is x×105x \times 10^{-5} m.

Comparing 3×1053 \times 10^{-5} m with X×105X \times 10^{-5} m, we find X=3X = 3.

The final answer is 3\boxed{3}.