Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Let k be a positive real number such that $\frac{1}{k+a} + \frac{1}{k+b} + \frac{1}{k+c} < 1$ for an...

Let k be a positive real number such that 1k+a+1k+b+1k+c<1\frac{1}{k+a} + \frac{1}{k+b} + \frac{1}{k+c} < 1 for any positive real numbers a, b and c with abc = 1. Then the least integral value of k is equal to

Answer

3

Explanation

Solution

The problem asks for the least integral value of a positive real number kk such that the inequality 1k+a+1k+b+1k+c<1\frac{1}{k+a} + \frac{1}{k+b} + \frac{1}{k+c} < 1 holds for any positive real numbers a,b,ca, b, c with abc=1abc = 1.

We need to find the smallest integer kk that satisfies this condition.

Step 1: Determine the necessary conditions for k.

We consider specific cases for a,b,ca, b, c that satisfy abc=1abc=1.

  • Case 1: a=b=c=1a=b=c=1

    If a=b=c=1a=b=c=1, then abc=1abc=1 is satisfied. Substituting these values into the inequality: 1k+1+1k+1+1k+1<1\frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{k+1} < 1 3k+1<1\frac{3}{k+1} < 1 Since kk is a positive real number, k+1k+1 is positive. We can multiply both sides by k+1k+1 without changing the inequality direction: 3<k+13 < k+1 k>2k > 2

  • Case 2: Consider a limit where one variable becomes very large and the others become very small.

    Let a=N2a = N^2, b=1Nb = \frac{1}{N}, c=1Nc = \frac{1}{N}. As NN \to \infty, aa \to \infty, b0+b \to 0^+, and c0+c \to 0^+. Also, abc=N21N1N=1abc = N^2 \cdot \frac{1}{N} \cdot \frac{1}{N} = 1 is always satisfied. Substitute these into the inequality: 1k+N2+1k+1/N+1k+1/N<1\frac{1}{k+N^2} + \frac{1}{k+1/N} + \frac{1}{k+1/N} < 1 Now, consider the limit as NN \to \infty: limN(1k+N2+1k+1/N+1k+1/N)\lim_{N \to \infty} \left( \frac{1}{k+N^2} + \frac{1}{k+1/N} + \frac{1}{k+1/N} \right) =0+1k+0+1k+0=1k+1k=2k= 0 + \frac{1}{k+0} + \frac{1}{k+0} = \frac{1}{k} + \frac{1}{k} = \frac{2}{k} Since the inequality must hold for all a,b,ca,b,c, it must hold for the limit of this sequence. Therefore: 2k1\frac{2}{k} \le 1 Since kk is positive, we can multiply by kk: 2k2 \le k

Combining the conditions from Case 1 (k>2k>2) and Case 2 (k2k \ge 2), we must have k>2k>2. Since kk is an integer, the least integral value of kk must be 33.

Step 2: Verify that k=3k=3 satisfies the inequality for all a,b,c>0a,b,c > 0 with abc=1abc=1.

We need to prove that 13+a+13+b+13+c<1\frac{1}{3+a} + \frac{1}{3+b} + \frac{1}{3+c} < 1 for all a,b,c>0a,b,c > 0 with abc=1abc=1. To prove this, we can clear the denominators. Multiply both sides by (3+a)(3+b)(3+c)(3+a)(3+b)(3+c): (3+b)(3+c)+(3+a)(3+c)+(3+a)(3+b)<(3+a)(3+b)(3+c)(3+b)(3+c) + (3+a)(3+c) + (3+a)(3+b) < (3+a)(3+b)(3+c) Expand the terms:

Left Hand Side (LHS): (9+3b+3c+bc)+(9+3a+3c+ac)+(9+3a+3b+ab)(9+3b+3c+bc) + (9+3a+3c+ac) + (9+3a+3b+ab) =27+6a+6b+6c+ab+bc+ca= 27 + 6a + 6b + 6c + ab + bc + ca =27+6(a+b+c)+(ab+bc+ca)= 27 + 6(a+b+c) + (ab+bc+ca)

Right Hand Side (RHS): (9+3a+3b+ab)(3+c)(9+3a+3b+ab)(3+c) =27+9c+9a+3ac+9b+3bc+3ab+abc= 27 + 9c + 9a + 3ac + 9b + 3bc + 3ab + abc =27+9(a+b+c)+3(ab+bc+ca)+abc= 27 + 9(a+b+c) + 3(ab+bc+ca) + abc Since abc=1abc=1, substitute this into the RHS: RHS=27+9(a+b+c)+3(ab+bc+ca)+1\text{RHS} = 27 + 9(a+b+c) + 3(ab+bc+ca) + 1 =28+9(a+b+c)+3(ab+bc+ca)= 28 + 9(a+b+c) + 3(ab+bc+ca)

Now, the inequality becomes: 27+6(a+b+c)+(ab+bc+ca)<28+9(a+b+c)+3(ab+bc+ca)27 + 6(a+b+c) + (ab+bc+ca) < 28 + 9(a+b+c) + 3(ab+bc+ca) Rearrange the terms by moving all terms to the right side: 0<(2827)+(96)(a+b+c)+(31)(ab+bc+ca)0 < (28-27) + (9-6)(a+b+c) + (3-1)(ab+bc+ca) 0<1+3(a+b+c)+2(ab+bc+ca)0 < 1 + 3(a+b+c) + 2(ab+bc+ca) Since a,b,ca,b,c are positive real numbers, a+b+ca+b+c is positive and ab+bc+caab+bc+ca is positive. Therefore, 1+3(a+b+c)+2(ab+bc+ca)1 + 3(a+b+c) + 2(ab+bc+ca) is always positive. This proves that the inequality 13+a+13+b+13+c<1\frac{1}{3+a} + \frac{1}{3+b} + \frac{1}{3+c} < 1 holds true for all positive a,b,ca,b,c with abc=1abc=1.

Conclusion:

We found that kk must be strictly greater than 2, and we proved that k=3k=3 satisfies the condition. Therefore, the least integral value of kk is 3.