Question
Question: Let f be a continuous non-algebraic twice derivable increasing function in (0,1) & f"(x)>0. If f(0) ...
Let f be a continuous non-algebraic twice derivable increasing function in (0,1) & f"(x)>0. If f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1 and g(x) is inverse of f(x), then which of the following holds good?

xf(x)≤f′(x)∀x∈(0,1)
xf(x)≥f′(x)∀x∈(0,1)
xf(x)<g(x)x∀x∈(0,1)
xf(x)>g(x)x∀x∈(0,1)
A, C
Solution
The problem asks us to identify the correct statement regarding a function f(x) and its inverse g(x).
Given properties of f(x):
- f(x) is continuous, twice derivable, and increasing in (0,1).
- f′′(x)>0 in (0,1), which means f(x) is strictly convex.
- f(0)=0 and f(1)=1.
- g(x) is the inverse of f(x), so f(g(x))=x and g(f(x))=x.
Analyzing Option (A) and (B): Comparing xf(x) and f′(x)
Consider the function f(x) on the interval [0,x] for any x∈(0,1). Since f(x) is continuous on [0,x] and differentiable on (0,x), by the Mean Value Theorem (MVT), there exists a c∈(0,x) such that:
f′(c)=x−0f(x)−f(0)
Given f(0)=0, this simplifies to:
f′(c)=xf(x)
We are given that f′′(x)>0 for x∈(0,1). This implies that f′(x) is a strictly increasing function in (0,1). Since c∈(0,x), we have c<x. Because f′(x) is strictly increasing, it follows that f′(c)<f′(x). Substituting f′(c)=xf(x), we get:
xf(x)<f′(x) for all x∈(0,1).
Therefore, option (A) xf(x)≤f′(x) holds good (since it includes the strict inequality), and option (B) xf(x)≥f′(x) is incorrect.
Analyzing Option (C) and (D): Comparing xf(x) and g(x)x
Let's first establish a relationship between f(x) and x. Consider the function h(x)=f(x)−x. We know h(0)=f(0)−0=0. We know h(1)=f(1)−1=0. Since f′′(x)>0, f(x) is strictly convex. A strictly convex function whose graph passes through (0,0) and (1,1) must lie below the line segment connecting these two points. The line segment connecting (0,0) and (1,1) is y=x. Therefore, for x∈(0,1), f(x)<x. This implies h(x)<0 for x∈(0,1).
Now, let's use the property f(x)<x to analyze options (C) and (D). Option (C) is xf(x)<g(x)x. Since x∈(0,1), x>0. Also, since f(x) is increasing and f(0)=0, f(x)>0 for x∈(0,1). Similarly, g(x) is also increasing and g(0)=0, so g(x)>0 for x∈(0,1). We can multiply the inequality by x⋅g(x) (which is positive) without changing the inequality direction:
f(x)⋅g(x)<x2
Let y=f(x). Since g(x) is the inverse of f(x), we have x=g(y). Substitute y=f(x) and x=g(y) into the inequality f(x)⋅g(x)<x2:
y⋅g(y)<(g(y))2
Since y∈(0,1), g(y)∈(0,1), so g(y)>0. We can divide by g(y):
y<g(y)
Now, substitute back y=f(x):
f(x)<g(f(x))
Since g(f(x))=x (by definition of inverse function):
f(x)<x
This is exactly the condition we derived from the strict convexity of f(x) and its boundary conditions f(0)=0,f(1)=1. Since f(x)<x for x∈(0,1) is true, the equivalent inequality xf(x)<g(x)x is also true. Therefore, option (C) holds good. Option (D) xf(x)>g(x)x is incorrect.
Both (A) and (C) are correct statements.
Explanation:
- For Option (A): Since f′′(x)>0, f′(x) is strictly increasing. By MVT on [0,x], x−0f(x)−f(0)=f′(c) for some c∈(0,x). Given f(0)=0, we have xf(x)=f′(c). Since c<x and f′(x) is increasing, f′(c)<f′(x). Thus, xf(x)<f′(x).
- For Option (C): Since f(x) is strictly convex and f(0)=0,f(1)=1, its graph lies below the line y=x for x∈(0,1). Therefore, f(x)<x. Let's check the given inequality xf(x)<g(x)x. Since x,f(x),g(x) are all positive in (0,1), we can multiply by xg(x) to get f(x)g(x)<x2. Let y=f(x). Then x=g(y). Substituting these into the inequality gives y⋅g(y)<(g(y))2. Since g(y)>0, we can divide by g(y) to get y<g(y). Substituting back y=f(x), we get f(x)<g(f(x)). Since g(f(x))=x, the inequality simplifies to f(x)<x. As we established, f(x)<x is true for x∈(0,1) due to the convexity and boundary conditions. Therefore, option (C) is also correct.