Solveeit Logo

Question

Question: Overall changes in volume and radii of a uniform cylindrical steel wire are 0.2% and 0.002% respecti...

Overall changes in volume and radii of a uniform cylindrical steel wire are 0.2% and 0.002% respectively when subjected to some suitable force. Longitudinal tensile stress acting on the wire is :- (Y = 2.0 × 10¹¹ Nm⁻²)

A

3.2 × 10⁹ Nm⁻²

B

3.2 × 10⁷ Nm⁻²

C

3.6 × 10⁹ Nm⁻²

D

3.9 × 10⁸ Nm⁻²

Answer

3.9 × 10⁸ Nm⁻²

Explanation

Solution

Let the original length of the wire be LL, and the original radius be rr. The original volume is V=πr2LV = \pi r^2 L. When subjected to a tensile force, the length increases by ΔL\Delta L and the radius decreases by Δr\Delta r. The longitudinal strain is ϵL=ΔLL\epsilon_L = \frac{\Delta L}{L}. The radial strain is ϵr=Δrr\epsilon_r = \frac{\Delta r}{r}. For tensile stress, the radius decreases, so ϵr\epsilon_r is negative.

The volume change can be related to the strains. Taking the natural logarithm of the volume formula: lnV=ln(πr2L)=lnπ+2lnr+lnL\ln V = \ln(\pi r^2 L) = \ln \pi + 2 \ln r + \ln L Differentiating with respect to small changes: dVV=2drr+dLL\frac{dV}{V} = 2 \frac{dr}{r} + \frac{dL}{L} For small strains, this can be written as: ΔVV2ϵr+ϵL\frac{\Delta V}{V} \approx 2 \epsilon_r + \epsilon_L

The problem states that the overall changes in volume and radii are 0.2% and 0.002% respectively. It is most consistent to interpret the longitudinal strain ϵL\epsilon_L as 0.2%0.2\% and the radial strain ϵr\epsilon_r as 0.002%-0.002\%.

If ϵL=0.2%=0.002\epsilon_L = 0.2\% = 0.002 and ϵr=0.002%=0.00002\epsilon_r = -0.002\% = -0.00002: The implied volume change is ΔVV=ϵL+2ϵr=0.002+2(0.00002)=0.0020.00004=0.00196\frac{\Delta V}{V} = \epsilon_L + 2\epsilon_r = 0.002 + 2(-0.00002) = 0.002 - 0.00004 = 0.00196, which is 0.196%0.196\%. This is very close to the stated 0.2%0.2\%.

The longitudinal tensile stress (σ\sigma) is given by Young's modulus (YY) and longitudinal strain (ϵL\epsilon_L): σ=Y×ϵL\sigma = Y \times \epsilon_L Given Y=2.0×1011 Nm2Y = 2.0 \times 10^{11} \text{ Nm}^{-2} and ϵL=0.002\epsilon_L = 0.002: σ=(2.0×1011 Nm2)×(0.002)\sigma = (2.0 \times 10^{11} \text{ Nm}^{-2}) \times (0.002) σ=4.0×108 Nm2\sigma = 4.0 \times 10^8 \text{ Nm}^{-2}

This calculated value (4.0×108 Nm24.0 \times 10^8 \text{ Nm}^{-2}) is closest to option (D) 3.9×108 Nm23.9 \times 10^8 \text{ Nm}^{-2}. Let's check if option (D) is consistent: If σ=3.9×108 Nm2\sigma = 3.9 \times 10^8 \text{ Nm}^{-2}, then ϵL=σY=3.9×1082.0×1011=1.95×103=0.00195\epsilon_L = \frac{\sigma}{Y} = \frac{3.9 \times 10^8}{2.0 \times 10^{11}} = 1.95 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00195. This is 0.195%0.195\%, very close to 0.2%0.2\%. With ϵr=0.00002\epsilon_r = -0.00002, the volume change would be ΔVV=0.00195+2(0.00002)=0.001950.00004=0.00191\frac{\Delta V}{V} = 0.00195 + 2(-0.00002) = 0.00195 - 0.00004 = 0.00191, or 0.191%0.191\%, which is also close to 0.2%0.2\%. Therefore, option (D) is the most appropriate answer.